Search for: "W W Long" Results 3501 - 3520 of 13,924
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2020, 3:47 am by Robert McKennon
  The court found that Sullivan-Mestecky had plausibly pled the five elements required to make an estoppel claim against Verizon, because Verizon had sent Sullivan an enrollment worksheet that indicated that she was eligible for a life insurance policy valued at $679,700, a retirement of confirmation worksheet, a confirmation of coverage on demand letter, a beneficiary confirmation notice and a Form W-2, all of which represented that Verizon was providing Sullivan with a generous life… [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 12:07 pm by The Murray Law Firm
” WYFF4.com  is reporting, “[w]hen officers arrived, they found Trevor Ridge, 43, of Asheville severely injured. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 8:44 am by The Murray Law Firm
” WXII12.com is reporting, “[w]hen they got to the scene, officers located Suzanne Polastre suffering from gunshot injuries. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:01 am by petrocohen
As long as you got injured or sick on the job, you should have a claim for benefits. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 2:39 pm by Jason Mazzone
So long as the plaintiff's sex was one but-for cause of that decision, that is enough to trigger the law. . . . [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 11:43 am by Joshua Cossin
” Missouri has long been a battleground state for the issue of abortion. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:31 am by Amanda L. Tyler
” As for petitioner’s due process argument, the Supreme Court noted that “[w]hile aliens who have established connections in this country have due process rights in deportation proceedings, the Court long ago held that Congress is entitled to set the conditions for an alien’s lawful entry into this country and that, as a result, an alien at the threshold of initial entry cannot claim any greater rights under the Due Process Clause. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am by Aditi Shah
On June 25, the Supreme Court ruled 7-2 that Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam, an asylum-seeker, does not have a constitutional right to habeas corpus review in federal court of his claims that the government violated his constitutional, statutory and regulatory rights in issuing an order for his expedited removal. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At The Economist’s Espresso blog, Steven Mazie observes that “[f]or the first time since 1996 it is July and the Supreme Court still has cases to rule on[; w]ith eight decisions to go in a term disrupted by covid-19, the justices are saving some closely watched cases for last. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:07 pm by Cory Doctorow
" -President George W Bush Anti-monopoly enforcement has seen a significant shift since the 1970s. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 8:21 am by The Murray Law Firm
  As reported by Tallahassee.com, “[t]he Tallahassee Police Department responded to the shooting just before 10 p.m. at College Square Apartments, 2166 W. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
According to the plaintiffs, so long as they agreed to abide by certain physical-distancing measures, it would violate the Free Exercise Clause, Equal Protection Clause, and Due Process Clause to forbid the Church from hosting communal worship and ministry. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Jeff Margulies (US)
That authority holds that a state may compel commercial actors to disclose “purely factual and uncontroversial information,” as long as the disclosures are “reasonably related” to a substantial government interest and are neither “unjustified [n]or unduly burdensome. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:48 am by The Murray Law Firm
OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
Turchin denied that he had “a deep or long-term professional relationship with Steven Mendelow” and averred he was unaware of any improper relationship between K&W and BLMIS or knew that BLMIS was a Ponzi scheme. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 10:55 am by Daniel Cappetta
” Section 58A(4) provides that “‘[w]hen a person is held under arrest for an offense listed in subsection (1) and upon a motion by the [C]ommonwealth, the judge shall hold a [dangerousness] hearing. [read post]