Search for: "AT&T Services Inc. " Results 3521 - 3540 of 17,723
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
AT&T Services, Inc. that a defendant’s dialing system did not constitute an “automatic telephone dialing system” (ATDS) under the meaning of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act where it was not capable of generating random and sequential numbers. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:17 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Website and participating and contributing to the discussions in our Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Website and participating and contributing to the discussions in our Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 2:41 pm by Corinne Falotico
AT&T Services, Inc., [1] the court ruled that a dialing system that “neither stores nor produces numbers using a random or sequential number generator,” but rather “exclusively dials numbers stored in a customer database,” “is not an ‘automatic telephone dialing system’ as defined by the Act. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 8:44 am by Dan Harris
And even if you don’t know China, it can be amazingly easy to navigate on your own and there are countless people out there who are super knowledgeable (and many who most emphatically are not) to help you. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 1:26 pm by Hannah Holmes
Our mailing address is: Fastcase Inc. 711 D Street NW Washington, DC 20004 Call us for help! [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:01 am by MBettman
Specifically, in paragraph 9 of the order of protection, the court ordered Rasawehr to refrain “from posting about Petitioners on any social media service, website, discussion board, or similar outlet or service and shall remove all such postings from CountyCoverUp.com that relate to Petitioners. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 1:55 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Lehtimaki & Ors v Cooper, heard 14- 15 January 2020 Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Visa Europe Services LLP & Ors, heard 20-23 January 2020 R V C, heard 27 January 2020 Peninsula Securities Ltd v Dunnes Stores (Bangor) Ltd (Northern Ireland), heard 28- 29 January 2020 Zipvit Ltd v Commissioners for HMMRC, heard 29- 30 January 2020 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd, heard 11-12 February 2020 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13… [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:37 am by MOTP
     Thanks to the common-law generosity of the SCOTX, Texas attorneys can now utilize Rule 91a to stick it to their victims; -- just in case the amended TCPA doesn’t do the trick. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 6:15 am by aschwartz
Harry’s was formed as an upstart company in 2013 as a subscription mail order razor service where users receive products monthly by mail. [read post]