Search for: "Bodie v Bodie"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 21,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2009, 7:16 am
Most recently, in a new referendum on the Citizens' Assembly proposal, only 38% of the voters agreed with the result the deliberative body preferred. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 5:33 am
As the dust begins to settle after the headline-grabbing Advocate General opinion in the Schrems v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 5:33 am
As the dust begins to settle after the headline-grabbing Advocate General opinion in the Schrems v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 6:40 am
Michael Todd v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 2:36 am
It accepted the Court of Appeal’s findings that the bra itself was not the object supporting or holding parts of the body and did not amount to an appliance to compensate for a defect or disability. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 8:07 am
Matheny v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The evolution of New York’s whistle blower laws protecting public officers and employees Castro v City of New York, 2016 NY Slip Op 05615, Appellate Division, First DepartmentIn his notice of claim dated November 17, 2012, Robert J. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
NLRB v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:19 am
Discussion This decision, like previous ones in Bezant v Rausing [2007] EWHC 1118 (QB): McBride v Body Shop Int Plc [2007] EWHC 1658 (QB) and Noorani v Calver [2009] EWHC 561 confirms that the Court will look carefully at claims in order to determine whether there is any real or substantial tort or that there would be any tangible or legitimate advantage to their continuance such as to outweigh the disadvantages for the parties in terms of expense, and the wider… [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:46 pm
This also isn't the first time Congress or some other legislative body screwed up a statute. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:06 am
See, e.g., Samson v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:22 pm
Antrim Truck Centre Ltd v Ontario (Minister Of Transportation)" (2011) 90 Can Bar Rev 215. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 7:45 pm
[Albrecht v. [read post]
3 May 2008, 8:05 am
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:34 pm
" Does this contract really permissibly stop the voters from, for example, putting body camera footage on the web (as in the present case), or doing anything else that would enhance oversight of the police? [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 6:37 am
The court also described the factors that supported the court’s conclusion that the production was inadvertent, including those referred to the decision in Jefferson v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 11:29 am
But see even more generally Epperson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:26 am
I've spent some time with the transcript in the Perez v. [read post]
