Search for: "Doe v. State"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 93,827
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2022, 4:51 pm
Does it mean total cold indifference on part of the state to all religions, or does it mean understanding and trying to accommodate the fears, needs and aspirations of those who do not have the strength of numbers? [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:43 am
In Maling v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:43 am
In Maling v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:43 am
In Maling v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:15 pm
A Louisiana state court has ruled in Stone Street Capital v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:04 pm
” United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm
Bostock v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:44 am
Janus v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 12:44 pm
Johnson argued that federal courts applying the ACCA are bound by the Florida Supreme Court's recent decision in State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 11:35 am
" The Court applied the logic of Pittsburgh Terminal Corp. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 11:26 am
This case, though, does not involve either judicial decisions or the actual statutes of the state. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:35 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:07 am
State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:34 am
Yet Plaintiffs call for prospective relief that does not include recovery of money from the state. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 5:32 am
This does not in my view amount to a lack of respect for the private life of the penetrating male. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 4:00 am
In Noe v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am
In accordance with these new Regulations, in September 2011 the State notified judges that it would reduce its contribution to sitting judges' health insurance premiums by 6% and reduce its contributions to retired judges' health insurance premiums by 2%.The State argued that the Compensation Clause does not prohibit the State from decreasing its contributions to the health insurance premiums because any reduction to judicial compensation was… [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 4:16 am
” State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 10:30 am
Today, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Scalia in United States v. [read post]
