Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 8,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2012, 1:47 pm
Cannon v. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 6:54 pm
If a hearing is demanded, the board must file a complaint in the superior court setting forth the charges against the employee and asking the court to determine if the charges are true and, if so, whether the constitute grounds for placing the employee on mandatory sick leave. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 6:54 pm
If a hearing is demanded, the board must file a complaint in the superior court setting forth the charges against the employee and asking the court to determine if the charges are true and, if so, whether the constitute grounds for placing the employee on mandatory sick leave. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:16 am
The Court affirmed the superior court’s action in remanding the case for trial. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:17 am
Superior Court, No. 16-466, 582 U.S. ___ (June 19, 2017). [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 4:50 am
In Vance v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 4:50 am
In Vance v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:38 am
MacNaughton v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:04 pm
The proponents of the doctrine cite some language from 19th century Supreme Court cases, but those quotations are cherry-picked out of context--the situation discussed is that a usurious discounting of a loan does not render a non-usurious loan itself usurious. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
It will be interesting to see what (if anything) the California Supreme Court does with the recent Clarendon v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 12:00 am
Superior Court, 169 Cal.App.4th 497 (Cal.App. 2008), which had previously held that “a ZIP code, without more, does not constitute personal identification information. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:05 am
Superior Court, 169 Cal.App.4th 497 (Cal.App. 2008), which had previously held that “a ZIP code, without more, does not constitute personal identification information. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Quoting the Supreme Court’s decision in Asahi Metal Indus. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:14 pm
Foster Wheeler, the Ontario Superior Court recently held that the insurance clause did preclude such an action against the contractor. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 9:44 am
For more on the history and significance of initiatives, check out the Initiative and Referendum Institute.The significance of the right of initiative and referendum was not lost on the California Supreme Court in the decision of Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v The Superior Court S207173. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:19 pm
For the first time in the Court’s case-law, Macatė v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 11:27 am
[ILB - the case is State of Indiana v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 5:07 pm
Also, in a parallel case (Malandrucco v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 4:41 pm
” The Court reminds that in Nagla v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 4:16 am
While of course the courts have superior authority to the tribunals, they have also recognised the specialist expertise of such tribunals in the past.Hogan J. also does not refer to Dubyna v Hourican Hygiene (2005) UD 781/2004, another EAT case in which it was found that a contract in breach of the Employment Permits Act 2003 was enforceable where the employee was unaware of the breach. [read post]
