Search for: "Does, 1-20"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 27,646
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2019, 12:58 pm
”On 20 September 2013 a Polish company, Optimum Mark, filed an application with the EUIPO for a declaration of invalidity of both marks.It argued that the first mark did not meet the requirements of what is now Article 7(1)(a) Regulation 2017/1001 (EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR), since its representation did not systematically arrange the colours by associating them in a predetermined and uniform way. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:31 pm
The Court found that the assessment of Art. 7(1)(f) EUTMR cannot be based either on the perception of the majority or on the part of the public that does not find anything shocking. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 9:41 am
Id. at *1. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 1:00 am
In the fight against intellectual property rights (IPRs) infringements, China does not consider punitive damages as a taboo. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:47 am
It simply does not matter whether that phrase would clearly mean one-sixteenth. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
The present decision reminds us that the use of unusual parameters in claims may backfire on the applicant.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read (differences with respect to claim 1 as filed are highlighted):1. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:50 pm
Id. at *20. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:00 pm
§ 636(b)(1)). [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:32 am
June 20, 2013): This is an attempt to upset a jury verdict based on a Facebook relationship. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
On February 20, clerks will begin counting any returned mail-in ballots. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 7:28 am
(9/8/20; adapted from 3/27/20 Webinar Question 1) Yes. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:34 pm
" Br. of Amicus United States 19-20. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 3:15 am
In the reexamination of the CAT patent only claims 20-22, 25-33 and 36-38 were subject to reexamination (The ‘859 Patent issued with claims 1-38). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:57 pm
Federal law doesn’t ban such possession, but it does bar gun dealers from selling handguns to 18-to-20-year-olds, which makes handguns available to 18-to-20-year-olds only by the good graces of a nondealer third party who is willing to sell to them. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 8:10 am
In support of its position the commissioner alleged that the appraisal: (1) was made more than 60 days before the grant of the second conservation easement; (2) does not describe the property; (3) does not contain the expected date of contribution; (4) does not contain the terms of the second conservation easement; (5) does not include the appraised fair market value of the second conservation easement on the expected date of contribution; and (6)… [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 4:05 am
If the answer to #1 above is "yes," who pays the HSR filing fee: - Executive with no reimbursement by the company - 40% - Executive with full reimbursement by the company - 20% - Executive with partial reimbursement by the company - 0% - Company - 40% 3. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:27 am
Salta was thereafter relieved by this court on March 18, 20 11. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 6:42 am
It does not, according to a recent ruling by the U.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:54 am
In modern business litigation in North Carolina, it is increasingly rare to see a complaint that does not contain a claim under G.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:43 am
For example, FLSA-covered workers who perform support work “in connection with a contract” for less than 20 percent of their hours in a workweek are not entitled to the increased minimum wage. [read post]
