Search for: "Does 1-37"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 5,277
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2012, 3:11 am
In this case, the chi-squared function is given by: \( \displaystyle{\chi^2 (m, b) = \sum_{n = 1} ^N \frac{[y_n - (m \, x_n + b)]^2}{\sigma_n^2}} \quad . \) It’s probably overkill to write this function in C but it’ll do for our purposes today. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:22 pm
Russia (App nos. 4916/07, 25924/08 and 14599/09)). [37] However, the Court then went on to add that: … a demonstration may annoy or give offence to persons opposed to the ideas or claims that it is seeking to promote. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:27 am
, 2003 SCC 27 (CanLII), 2003 SCC 27, [2003] 1 S. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 6:15 am
Piper, 91 U.S. 37, 41 (1875); see also Dann v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:04 pm
These latter paragraphs were quoted at par 33 in this latest judgment (author’s emphasis): 37. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:34 am
Against these charges, what defenses does the authority offer? [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 8:40 am
Does his answer at the Article 32, UCMJ investigation constitute a prior inconsistent statement under Rule 801(d)(1)(A)? [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 7:01 pm
Article 176 of the Criminal Procedure Code, Annex 1. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:31 am
http://t.co/8jPiJJ1thttp://twitter.com/HarvardLaw74/statuses/2238602074140303372012-07-13 15:53:02 HarvardLaw74: In hindsight, venture capital, did Greylock and Andreessen really fund Digg ($45 mil.) http://t.co/enWrNYYa, only value click patent…http://twitter.com/HarvardLaw74/statuses/2238072556430458892012-07-13 15:43:59 HarvardLaw74: @bfrazjd Pirates storming in cyberlockers lesbian Harvard indie films a big hit on the #copyright high seas… [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:24 am
ES 1. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:11 am
District Y is a 1937 Act agency and does not participate in PERS. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
[iii] The Guidelines state in part: 1. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm
No Cause of Action = No Delay Justice Quiqley stated, paragraph 37: “There was a much more important and simple reason why Ms. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:57 am
Those cases, though, do not raise the issue of whether there is a constitutional right for homosexuals to marry, as does the California case. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm
That doesn’t sound like a very good deal for the buyer, does it? [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 2:59 am
The number of infected persons identified in each state was as follows: Alabama (1), Arkansas (1), California (4), Colorado (40), Idaho (2), Illinois (4), Indiana (3), Iowa (1), Kansas (11), Louisiana (2), Maryland (1), Missouri (7), Montana (2), Nebraska (6), Nevada (1), New Mexico (15), New York (2), North Dakota (2), Oklahoma (12), Oregon (1), Pennsylvania (1), South Dakota (1), Texas (18), Utah (1),… [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 1:37 pm
The number of infected persons identified in each state was as follows: Alabama (1), Arkansas (1), California (4), Colorado (40), Idaho (2), Illinois (4), Indiana (3), Iowa (1), Kansas (11), Louisiana (2), Maryland (1), Missouri (7), Montana (2), Nebraska (6), Nevada (1), New Mexico (15), New York (2), North Dakota (2), Oklahoma (12), Oregon (1), Pennsylvania (1), South Dakota (1), Texas (18), Utah (1),… [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:34 am
That respect, however, does not mean that the domestic law of the Ontario Court has been ousted. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
That respect, however, does not mean that the domestic law of the Ontario Court has been ousted. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:53 pm
C-324/09 (Court of Justice of the EU July, 12, 2011) -- recommending blocking order based on Senior Courts Act 1981 § 37(1) and based on an analysis of the CJEU's Enforcement Directive (2004/48/EC), at Art. 11. [read post]
