Search for: "Does 1-43" Results 3521 - 3540 of 4,490
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2011, 7:28 am by Elie Mystal
To keep the valuable Lewis & Clark leads within the Lewis & Clark community, the school periodically changes the password needed to access the board.The password for this cycle hit a little bit too close to home…Here’s the email Lewis & Clark alumni received earlier this week:From: Law School Career Services To: LSCS Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:43:21 -0800 Subject: New Job Posting PasswordFebruary 1, 2011Good Morning,Please find below the updated password for… [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:14 am by The Legal Blog
The learned Judges said that a just but unreasoned conclusion does not appear to be just to those who read the same. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:10 am
Donoghue, a teacher employed by the New York City Department of Education, asked to be granted tenure as an earth science teacher as of September 1, 2005. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:29 pm by Scott Koller
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 43 F.3d 1311, 1315 (9th Cir.1995) (“ Daubert II ”). [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:50 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
What does it feel like when your stuttering. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 12:42 pm
(i) Necessity[89] The principle of necessity does not mean that the hearsay evidence must be necessary in order for a party to prove his or her case. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
Beverly Hills, CA, US 90210 Telephone: +1 (310) 275-6664 Fax: +1 (310) 550-1856 aldenlaw@yahoo.com Dennis Moore, Attorney at Law 5041 La Mart Dr., Ste 230 Riverside, CA 92507 (951) 660-5289 Fax: (951) 340-3276 Mandelman out. ~~~ Filed 1/27/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE CLAUDIA JACQUELINE ACEVES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 5:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“The import of Dastar that an author's recourse for unauthorized use is in copyright cannot be avoided by shoe-horning a claim into section 43(a)(1)(B) rather than 43(a)(1)(A). [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
              The existing Indian family exception is a judicially created doctrine holding that the ICWA does not apply to those Indian children who have never been a member of an Indian home or culture and probably never would be.[14]  Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians[15], many states adopted the existing Indian family exception. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
              The existing Indian family exception is a judicially created doctrine holding that the ICWA does not apply to those Indian children who have never been a member of an Indian home or culture and probably never would be.[14]  Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians[15], many states adopted the existing Indian family exception. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:34 pm by Ray Dowd
Oman, 888 F.2d 878, 879 & n. 1 (D.C.Cir.1989) (“ Atari I ”); Nova Stylings, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 9:37 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Locke, Does anti-paparazzi mean anti-press? [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
This report leaves more questions than it does provide answers. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 7:21 am
") SC18383 Concurrence SC18383 Concurrence SC18383 Concurrence Published: 1/20/2011 11:43 AM [read post]