Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 3521 - 3540 of 6,456
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2022, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
ZXC v Bloomberg [2022] UKSC 5 This was the seminal privacy case of the year, decided by the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
The big factors were (1) the case involves a claim for a tort committed in England; (2) that claim was probably governed by English law; (3) the passing off evidence would focus on consumers in England; (4) the governing law for the contract claims is state of Pennsylvania. [read post]
21 May 2015, 2:55 am by Lyle Denniston
Plessy’s place in the list of worst Supreme Court decisions Looking back at the Brown v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:05 am by Schachtman
  See id. at para. 37, 38 (citing English v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 3:53 pm
Monday in Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 5:27 pm by John Borland
The team identified a flaw in the way Windows XP systems are allowed to switch user keyboard layouts — from an English keyboard to a German configuration, for example. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  In Rapanos v United States, the Court rejected what it considered overly broad interpretations of that phrase, noting that under some of the views presented, “waters of the United States” could “engulf entire cities and immense arid wastelands. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  In Rapanos v United States, the Court rejected what it considered overly broad interpretations of that phrase, noting that under some of the views presented, “waters of the United States” could “engulf entire cities and immense arid wastelands. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:12 am by Marissa Miller
New Hampshire and CompuCredit Corp. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Since Mrs Justice Collins Rice handed down judgment in Fox v Blake [2024] EWHC 146 (KB) there has been a lot of online discussion about the case. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:29 am
That doctrine, under the current law, had arisen in two previous English cases, Rotocrop International Ltd v Genbourne Ltd [1982] FSR 241 and Lacroix Duarib SA v Kwikform (UK) Ltd [1998] FSR 493. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:37 pm by Nicole Kellner-Swick
She can be reached at 412.338.7102 and kebeck@weltman.com. [1] Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:37 pm by Nicole Kellner-Swick
She can be reached at 412.338.7102 and kebeck@weltman.com. [1] Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 9:31 am by Giles Peaker
On the issue of whether he was completely wheelchair-bound and unable to weight bare and needed 24 hour care including night care, the Defendants did not accept the Claimant’s assertions.The Claimant had in the past alleged he could not speak English and later had been the translator into English for his family.For a period of time the Claimant had been receiving State funding for 35 hours per week of care provided by carers.The Claimant chose and moved into his flat… [read post]