Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 3521 - 3540 of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2019, 5:19 am by Dan Harris
The original English version of the documents to be served. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 6:03 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, DVM, Esq.
”  The Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc., on Behalf of Tommy v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 3:41 am by Charlotte Emmerson
TULRCA also requires employers to notify the Secretary of State of the proposal, via form HR1. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 4:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
NPR (Rachel Treisman) reports: Two German states have outlawed public displays of the letter "Z," which has become synonymous with support for Russia's war in Ukraine. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 8:37 am by Verena von Bomhard
The GC further stated that trademarks in the field of pet care products and food (classes 5 and 31) would normally be perceived visually, as the products are purchased from shelves. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 8:37 am by Brian A. Hall
SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd, [2010] EWHC 1829 (Ch) (July 23 2010). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:41 am by Adam Wagner
They had a five-minute conference before the trial but the lawyer spoke only limited English and the interpreter had not been present. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:01 am by Chukwuma Okoli
Deconstructing Rubin v Eurofinance SA and its impact on the recognition and enforcement of foreign insolvency judgments at common law” It was Lord Hoffmann who once spoke of a “golden thread” of modified universalism running throughout English Insolvency Law since the eighteenth century. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am by Barry Sookman
This basis of jurisdiction had been recently applied by the English Court of Appeal in Cartier International AG & Ors v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd & Ors [2016] EWCA Civ 658 (06 July 2016) in affirming the jurisdiction of English courts to make blocking orders against Internet Service Providers requiring them to disable access to foreign websites that offered counterfeit goods for sale. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
Counsel's perspective | Mr Justice Nugee and the Superhose: The potentiality of disclosure | Dutch Court of Appeal injuncts unwilling licensee in first post-Huawei v ZTE FRAND decision | English High Court seizes patent infringement jurisdiction once again | No knowledge in secondary copyright infringement of Eminem's first album | Ariana Grande, thank you, next: copyright infringement on Instagram | DSM Directive is now Directive 2019/790 and Member States will… [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm by Rachit Buch
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]