Search for: "Germany v. Germany"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 4,535
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 1:54 am
V. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:31 am
Deutsche Bank is of course a domiciled in Germany. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
Robert V. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:27 am
(Excess Copyright) Trade-mark Update (Part 2): Masterpiece v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
Botham concerns a youth community worker employed in Germany and subsequently dismissed for gross misconduct and put on a list of persons deemed unsuitable to work with children. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:01 am
Opus does not pay a private copying levy in respect of the media delivered to its customers in the Netherlands, either in that Member State or in Germany. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
(EPLAW) Cheapflights: OHIM excludes likelihood of confusion between conflicting signs, due to very low degree of distinctive character of earlier marks: T-460/09; T-461/09 (Class 46) General Court upholds opposition brought by PEPE JEANS against PEPEQUILLO CTM application: T-580/08 (Class 46) Royal treatment rejected in Luxembourg: T-397/09 (Class 46) ‘G’: Emram v OHIM: Guilty against Gucci (Class 46) General Court: summer time I and II – ‘Space of… [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
That decision, (Supreme Beef v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:28 pm
., v Royal Dutch Petroleum, et al., raises what may be the hottest international law issue now affecting business firms. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:22 am
Skyhook Wireless Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:00 pm
(BYU) presents a public lecture today on Worldwide v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:32 am
” Lermer Germany GmbH v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 7:41 am
This was the conundrum facing the Court of Appeal in Tate & Lyle v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:53 pm
Although theoretically a principle of recognition might be an opportunity (if one succumbs to the notion of such principle at all), the limits of such recognition would be rather strict in Germany nonetheless. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:44 am
Ct., 2003) (state law pre-empted), and Weiss v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:04 am
R. and H. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
A: We're following this from the side, the main event is really in Germany. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:47 am
In Römer v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (Romer), a reference was made to the European Court of Justice (the ECJ) for a preliminary ruling concerning the interpretation of Council Directive 2000/78/EC (concerning a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation) (the Directive) and of European legislation relating to discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation in employment and occupation. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
Tewari De-Ox Systems Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:58 pm
ePlus v. [read post]
