Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF J. L." Results 3521 - 3540 of 3,970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm by Adam Thierer
Vladeck states that advise-and-consent models “depended on the fiction that people were meaningfully giving consent. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Once again the Court has handed us three leading cases on closely-related themes – and these decisions have turned out in fact to be in many ways the most interesting of the lot. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am by Schachtman
  The law in most states is that an expert witness’s opinion can rise no higher than the facts upon which the opinion is based. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
The hypertechnical view would be counterproductive and would act against interests of women and against the object for which this provision was added. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:00 am by Steven Peck
At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court stated: "If I don't have an elder abuse case, I'm going to have one within a month. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:56 pm
The sole interest of the United States and the primary object in conferring the monopoly lie in the general benefits derived by the public from the labors of authors and artists.[10] Enforcement in China is lax especially when put into context of the Chinese legal system in which many of the most minor crimes are punished more severely than in Western countries.[11] It is this lack of enforcement that is troubling. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:35 am
                  Cheerleading as a Sport under Title IX Approximately half of the U.S. states have already recognized high school cheerleading under Title IX.[11]  Cheerleading has grown significantly in popularity among women, almost 25%, since 2000.[12]  Cheerleading’s largest barrier to achieving… [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
That’s the conflict of interest in law society management. [read post]
  For example, in human rights law, a violation will occur where there has been a failure of state protection.[6] Thus, it makes no sense to speak of a human rights violation and a failure of state protection.[7] And even if a human rights violation is taken to be demonstrative of a failure of state protection (which is true in human rights discourse), the Refugee Convention speaks of a state’s inability or unwillingness to protect an applicant. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
-EV] Professors Akhil Amar and Vik Amar have submitted an interesting amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:18 pm by Alfred Brophy
Forbath, Courting the State: An Essay for Morton Horwitz 7 Robert W. [read post]