Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 22,260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 7:06 am
They may file grievances within the prison system or pursue legal action in state or federal court. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 3:55 am
A stipulation which stated that the statute of limitations would not be asserted failed to stop the assertion of the statute of limitations in Dineen v Pratt 2017 NY Slip Op 07590 Decided on November 1, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department the first half of which we reported on yesterday. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Everplay Installation, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 5:03 am
Kotsovska v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:53 am
This lawsuit is no different, except, sadly, it involves the President of the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 2:51 pm
Justice Stephen Breyer’s majority opinion in Whole Woman’s Health held that the Texas law constituted an “undue burden” on access to abortion in violation of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 2:57 pm
The US Supreme Court announced Monday that it will hear arguments in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:34 am
In Zeinali v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 7:42 pm
State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 1:41 pm
") AC29684 - State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 1:21 pm
Visa and Perfect 10 v. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:08 am
State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 6:36 am
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 4:32 pm
Lyons v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 9:25 am
Specific jurisdiction may exist where the claim is related to or arises out of the defendant's contacts with the state, or general jurisdiction may exist when the defendant's contacts with the forum state are continuous and systematic. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:47 am
Vance v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
The Appeal The main ground of appeal was based on the common law right of access to court, established in Raymond v Honey [1983 1 AC.1, 13] and a series of pre Human Rights cases such as R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Leech [1994] QB 198, and R (Anufrijeva) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC 604 at 621[26]. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:25 am
was holding the state to an unduly high burden of proof. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:44 am
In the years after the Court of Appeals decision in Stith three of the four Appellate Departments have issued rulings counter to the Stith holding, concluding that because it is the defendant's initial burden to establish standing, the People may raise defendant's lack of standing for the first time on appeal (see People v McCall, 51 AD3d 822, 822 [2d Dept 2008] lv denied 11 NY3d 856 [2008]; People v Hooper, 245 AD2d 1020, 1021 [4th Dept 1997]; People v… [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm
Co. v. [read post]
