Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 22,138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Union, AFL-CIO, Local 200 United, 2015 NY Slip Op 07092, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentZajac v New York State Div. of Human Rights & Serv. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:42 am
In Suarez v. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 3:12 pm
Ct. 2012); and Iseberg v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 12:49 pm
Professor Rick Hasen has some thoughts on RNC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 12:27 pm
The court concludes that the government interest in protecting the public as set forth in the Legislative findings of MHL § 10.01 et seq. is not effectuated by the broad mandatory detention provisions of MHL § 10.06(k), and there is significant fiscal value and very small burden to the State if it were to modify the statute to safeguard the pre-trial detention due process rights of respondents. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:51 am
The court found that the Act imposed equal burdens on both in-state and out-of-state staffing firms, with no evidence of protectionist intent or effect. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 3:55 am
A stipulation which stated that the statute of limitations would not be asserted failed to stop the assertion of the statute of limitations in Dineen v Pratt 2017 NY Slip Op 07590 Decided on November 1, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department the first half of which we reported on yesterday. [read post]
17 May 2008, 9:38 pm
United States, 364 U.S. 40, 49 (1960). [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 2:12 pm
That language -- like the language in CACI 201 -- comes directly from a California Supreme Court opinion that so stated. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Terry v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:25 am
was holding the state to an unduly high burden of proof. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:39 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 5:35 am
Citizens failed to meet their burden to prove the sufficiency of sole member's contacts or actions within the state to constitute "doing business," therefore, the sole member's status as co-applicant or agent in pursuing the special exception was also irrelevant. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 2:42 pm
Indeed, arguably, the job's an even better one when you like your colleagues, they tend to see things the same way as you do, no one's a huge jerk, and you're not burdened with having to write dozens of passion-filled dissents every single year.So why not hang in there? [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:45 am
Latif v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 5:43 am
RFRA, the statute at issue in City of Boerne, applied whether or not the state intended to impose a substantial burden. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 11:00 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:37 pm
In Braden v. [read post]
