Search for: "State v. Downes" Results 3521 - 3540 of 36,289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2019, 5:32 pm by INFORRM
On 4 March 2019, the decision in Venables & Anor v News Group Papers Ltd & Ors ([2019] EWHC 494 (Fam)) was handed down. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 8:10 pm
Nor, the state continues, is certiorari warranted based either on the prospect of overruling the Court's decision in Murray v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:47 am by Eric Citron
  That concern might be interpreted (as a matter of legal theory) in a few different ways:  Justice Kennedy might believe that Congress would not have intended to set up such a dubious system; he might believe that this reading is required but actually unconstitutional (so that he would strike down the statute’s condition that subsidies apply only to exchanges established by the state); or – perhaps most likely – he might believe that the statute should… [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 10:13 am by Bartolus
The Court of Justice has handed down an important and interesting judgment on the right of a member State to restrict the number of students coming from other member States. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:34 am by Lyle Denniston
Howard Marshall to the endless litigation (the fictional Jarndyce v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Will Holder, Olswang LLP
A full case comment on the decision will be provided on this blog once judgment has been handed down. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 2:01 am by Andrew Trask
At least as far as Ireland and Luxembourg, each of which produced a number of plaintiffs in Trezziova v. [read post]
30 Jul 2006, 8:56 am
The Court of Justice handed down an interesting judgment in Case C-119/04 Commission v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 10:29 am by Daniel Nazer and Daniel Nazer
Today EFF, together with Public Knowledge, filed an amicus brief in Nautilus v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 8:32 am by Jason Shinn
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) was recently smacked down by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in EEOC v Peoplemark, Inc. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 4:04 pm by AALRR
Further, the court stated, "[t]he limitation on damages in this case is so egregious and so draconian that it should not be permitted to be severed. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 5:07 pm by Kent Scheidegger
"  For cases from the lower federal courts, the high court has the jurisdiction to take a case from them before they are done with it, but it rarely does.The case of Dept. of Homeland Security v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 5:42 pm by SC Divorce and Disabilty
While the walk down the aisle ends in marital bliss for many couples, for an equal number the end of the aisle is a place far, far away from happily ever after. [read post]