Search for: "State v. Keis" Results 3521 - 3540 of 22,484
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2016, 2:15 pm by David Gans
Breyer’s majority opinion makes three key holdings, affirming the vital role courts play in ensuring that states respect the fundamental constitutional principles of liberty, equality, and dignity. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 1:15 am by Sean O'Beirne, Kingsley Napley LLP
It states that “an examining officer may question a person to whom this paragraph applies for the purpose of determining whether he appears to be a person who [is or has been concerned in the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism]. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 4:24 am by Alexandra Allan
The key question was whether the Defendant had failed to fulfil his side of the bargain, and he clearly had. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 9:10 am
The study of pro se defendants (post earlier today) reminds me of a recent Washington case where the defendant who chose to represent himself lost on appeal, forced to live with the consequences of his waiver of counsel: State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 8:10 pm by Ilya Somin
Here are a few of the key findings: In most states and under federal law, law enforcement can keep some or all of the proceeds from civil forfeitures. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:16 pm
However, field sobriety tests could not be administered due to the state of defendant’s agitation. [read post]