Search for: "Styles v. State"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 5,641
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2013, 8:35 am
At least since Altria v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 8:24 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Social media behemoth Facebook and an Oregon ad agency have been sued for copyright infringement [17 U.S.C. sec. 101 et seq.] in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan by the company that licenses and manages the music of 40-year-old rapper/songwriter Eminem (Marshall Bruce Mathers III).In the Complaint filed May 20, Eight Mile Style, LLC & Martin Affiliated LLC v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 11:44 am
In this act, the General Assembly expressly declared its intent to "address the recent Virginia Supreme Court holding in the case styled Connell v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:56 am
JAR Laboratories LLC v. [read post]
19 May 2013, 8:54 am
It is styled, Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co v. [read post]
18 May 2013, 7:12 am
The style of the case is, Amy Warmbrod v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Lexis 84, at *20 (quoting Wenrick v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 8:08 am
The style is Pilot Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 6:38 am
The style of the case is, McFarland v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 8:51 am
Washington v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 7:47 am
Cranor, “Milward v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 11:22 pm
Robart's Microsoft v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm
However, the European Commission's preliminary assessment is that the license agreement underlying that rate-setting case came into being under anticompetitive circumstances, calling into question whether there even is an enforceable agreement in place.Alternatively to a process in Germany, Google "suggest[ed] the [arbitration] panel [in the United States] employ a 'baseball arbitration' procedure to resolve any areas in which the parties are unable to reach agreement" (emphasis mine). [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:44 pm
Cribbing now from his abstract: District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:40 pm
In Sony v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:11 am
Equally, it is generally accepted that copyright, at least, does not protect a "style" (in England and Wales there is Gordon Fraser v Tatt [1966] RPC 505, which establishes that proposition in respect of greeting cards). [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:47 am
In doing so, the Court stated that, `a State has no business telling a man, sitting alone in his own house, what books he may read or what films he may watch. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 2:49 pm
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington published his FRAND rate-setting decision in the Microsoft v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 7:07 pm
Abdouch v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 4:00 pm
Maechtlen We previously blogged about DFEH v. [read post]
