Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 10,422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm
552/09 P, Ferrero SpA v OHIM, Tirol Milch reg.Gen.mbH, Innsbruck (Class 46) (IPKat) Mark your calendar right! [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:01 am
Holder, the United States seeks to remove from the United States a lawful permanent resident who has lived here since 1974, because he was convicted of voluntary manslaughter in 1989. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
Thus, to state a § 1983 claim, a plaintiff must allege two elements: (1) a deprivation of rights secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States, and (2) that `the deprivation was caused by a person acting under color of state law. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:30 pm
Today, Mark Dambroff tackles the subject of that flight attendant’s terrible joke on the subject. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm
– McLean, VA lawyer Mark Dombroff of McKenna Long & Aldridge on the firm’s blog, Plane-ly Spoken Supreme Court rules induced infringement requires a 271(a) direct infringer (Limelight v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
at 126 (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:50 am
For JDPI or similarly situated trademark holders to obtain a different outcome, they must seek relief before the United States Supreme Court or the United States Congress. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 11:35 am
United States, 47 S.Ct. 366 (1927). [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 5:02 pm
(“Arctic Cat”) appeals from a judgmentof the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida that Arctic Cat is not entitled to recover precomplaint damages from Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:14 pm
For example, if A has sued B in state court for trademark infringement, and the case is about to be decided, a federal court should stay proceedings in the case of B v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 10:53 pm
S. ___, ___ (2022) (slip op., at 5) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:37 am
Here’s a question, do you think the Wawa brand satisfies the now decade old requirement in the federal dilution law that Wawa is “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States“? [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:43 pm
On March 6, 2014, the District Court for the District of Columbia issued an opinion in United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 4:30 am
United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm
The caption: SINGER MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS, INC.; LIVE GOLD OPERATIONS, INC., v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:36 am
Case date: 08 October 2020 Case number: No. 19-3010 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Special Protection of Trade Marks with a Reputation under European Union Law by Michal Bohaczewski€ 136 [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 6:52 am
Case date: 19 October 2021 Case number: No. 2020-1196 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 6:52 am
Case date: 19 October 2021 Case number: No. 2020-1196 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:30 pm
Professor Mark Lemley On May 20, 2010, 86 law, economics, public policy and business professors filed an amici curiae brief with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit seeking the en banc review of the panel decision in In re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation, which issued on April 29, 2010. [read post]
