Search for: "California v. Texas"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 4,429
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2010, 5:28 am
In large states like Florida, California and Texas, Democrats have chance at picking up seats. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:34 am
Title: Wong v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:40 am
Cate decided last Monday and Michael Angelo Morales and Albert Greenwood Brown v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:16 am
Bank v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:37 am
., v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:01 pm
At Balkinization, guest blogger Sharon Dolovich explains why the Supreme Court’s Farmer v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 3:59 am
Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:43 pm
And his studies can have real-world impact: In its landmark 2006 ruling in eBay v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am
It is impossible, I think, to justify in a system that celebrates the idea of all people counting equally–the notion of one person, one vote–the fact that Wyoming has the same two votes in the Senate as California, when the latter has something like 65 or 70 times the population. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 12:43 am
Kennedy v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 646.214(b)(3) and (4), thereby preempting state-law claims of negligence.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of Texas)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief for Constitutional and Administrative Law ScholarsPetitioners' reply Title: Lonberg v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
See [V. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:18 am
Thus, Texas law was in conflict with that of California on the issue. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Texas (availability of damages for state violation of RLUIPA, which protects the exercise of religion by institutionalized persons, e.g., prison inmates) Arizona Christian School Tuition Organizations v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 9:34 am
In Bridge Fund Capital Corp. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:00 pm
Switzer is a Texas case that will be heard on October 13, 2010. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Superior Court, 79 P.3d 556, 563 (Cal. 2003).Lower California courts, but not the California Supreme Court, have cited Restatement Third §2 with approval. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:05 am
Supreme Court's Lewis v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:56 pm
Phillips (Central District of California) held that Don’t Ask Don’t Tell is facially unconstitutional. [read post]
