Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 7,433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2014, 11:27 am
At harvest time I will tell the reapers, “First collect the weeds and tie them in bundles to be burned, but then gather the wheat into my barn. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 2:49 pm
Moreover, it does the plaintiffs affirmative harm. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 5:06 am
To prove infringement by the accused composition X(infringe), the patentee has to both a) prove that X(infringe) has every single characteristic which is the inevitable consequence of a composition of X(claimed) but also b) ensure that it does not stray close to X(prior). [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 10:55 am
§ 201.57(c)(9)(i)(C)(4)). [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:30 am
While Preis begins his piece in the standard manner (“In part I, I argue X and in part II, I contend Y. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:00 pm
Though I was not surprised by the result of the grand jury deliberations in Ferguson, I thought the system had at least enough humility to police its outer limits. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:58 am
If you try cases, you know that the X factor is the jury. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 12:31 am
The reason is that the EPO interprets, for the purposes of assessing novelty, a claim that states "X obtained by process Y" as a claim to X as such, and will consider such a claim as lacking novelty if X as such is not new. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:57 pm
I think that it should. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:29 pm
Article X 1. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:29 pm
Article X 1. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 3:50 pm
Article X 1. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:57 pm
Schedule 1(i) of the Transparency Guidance identifies judgments arising from a ‘substantial contested fact-finding hearing at which serious allegations, eg allegations of significant physical, emotional or sexual harm, have been determined’ as likely candidates for publication, and such judgments are likely to emanate from both private and public law cases. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 10:38 am
” So, what does an IRP look like? [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
Flipped Classrooms) Time and time again I’m told, “I’d love to do [X], but I have to work on an article…” I will never understand why legal scholarship, with all of its flaws, is the gold standard measure of academic output and faculty quality. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Congress promises a state $X of funding to be used for highway construction for each of the next three years. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 2:01 pm
Kemp does it, and gives her patients and their doctors her direct telephone number. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
But this does not mean that size is irrelevant. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 2:26 pm
I have not seen this situation come to fruition as ultimately crimes are so different, kids won't talk, the rumors may be false and/or the family does not know how to get a hold of the student who "got away with it. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 12:33 pm
§ 112, ¶ 6 does not apply. [read post]
