Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 29,817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2019, 9:51 am
The diligent attorneys of The Law Offices of Johnathan F. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:19 am
For an extended discussion of this issue, check out my New York Law Journal article entitled "Co-Defendant Disparity as a Basis for a Non-Guidelines Sentence" (found here). [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:43 pm
F**k it. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 10:54 am
The trusted New Jersey DWI defense attorneys of The Law Offices of Jonathan F. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:00 am
It may be that this tension -- between the respective roles of evidence arbiter and ultimate fact-finder in reviewing the evidence -- may represent one of the best arguments for allocating the two jobs to two different actors, an argument, in other words, against bench trials.Posted by Sherry F. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 7:14 am
If you are faced with charges that you committed assault, the dedicated New Jersey criminal defense attorneys of The Law Offices of Jonathan F. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 5:37 am
D.C. 207, 865 F.2d 1306, 1312 (D.C. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 6:51 am
Kinder, 363 F. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
Serv. 2d 371 (1982) and In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, 471 F.3d 24 (2d Cir. 2006), decision clarified on denial of reh’g, 483 F.3d 70 (2d Cir. 2007)). [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 9:05 pm
., ___ F.3d ___ (1st Cir. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
Serv. 2d 371 (1982) and In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, 471 F.3d 24 (2d Cir. 2006), decision clarified on denial of reh’g, 483 F.3d 70 (2d Cir. 2007)). [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 6:51 am
Kinder, 363 F. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 5:22 pm
Warsaw, 778 F.3d at 1372. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 6:14 am
Pacificorp, 324 F.3d 1176, 1179 (10th Cir. 2003); Ginett v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 10:02 am
Those readers defending PMA medical device defendants should review Parker v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm
Wyeth LLC, 872 F. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am
Dist., 140 AD3d 728, 730; Calcagno v John F. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:23 am
Roybal, 737 F.3d 621 (9th Cir. 2013), directing the court to consider whether the upward adjustment for "distribution" under the Guidelines was proper where the images were shared only between these two people. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:18 am
Ward, 732 F.3d 175 (3d Cir. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S.Ct. 2684 (2014), the Third Circuit determined allowing cross-examination of allocution is plain error because it is contrary to the purpose of allocution, i.e., to allow a defendant to personally address the sentencing court and present mitigating evidence. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am
Dist., 140 AD3d 728, 730; Calcagno v John F. [read post]
