Search for: "Does 1-43" Results 3541 - 3560 of 4,490
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
 The plaintiffs alleged without contradiction, that Target, Snyders, and Coborn’s collectively owned 166 or about 43%, of the 384 Minnesota pharmacies of concern to the Court. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:14 am by John Day
Unfortunately, the Report does not tell us whether the damage awards were in jury or non-jury trials. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The resulting article, published in the 2009 Journal of Environmental Law, illustrates a pro-government approach which does the Commission no credit at all. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 11:48 am by John L. Welch
" Decision as PrecedentialPrededential No. 34: TTAB Affirms Refusal to Register "Beer Glass and Stand" Packaging for Lack of Distinctiveness Fraud: Precedential No. 36: TTAB Refuses to Find Fraudulent Intent Where Applicant Relied on Advice of CounselPrecedential No. 16: Fraud Claim Survives Motion to Dismiss; Facts Pleaded with Sufficient ParticularityPrecedential No. 2: TTAB Okays Fraud Pleading But Denies Summary Judgment on Intent Issue Genericness: Precedential No. 45: TTAB Finds… [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those states were Alaska[1], Arizona[2], Idaho[3], Michigan[4], New York[5], North Dakota[6], and Utah[7]. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those states were Alaska[1], Arizona[2], Idaho[3], Michigan[4], New York[5], North Dakota[6], and Utah[7]. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 7:37 pm
michaels-smolak.com Central NY Personal Injury Lawyer Michaels & Smolak, P.C. 1-315-253-3293 Toll Free 1-866-698-8169 [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:19 am
Why does WIPO not explain why it has not acted? [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 9:11 pm
  However, the Insurance Law does not set forth comparable statutory exclusions for corporations licensed pursuant to Article 43 of the Insurance Law, municipal cooperative health benefit plans issued a certificate of authority pursuant to Article 47 of the Insurance Law, or for health maintenance organizations (“HMOs”). [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
[J.] be uprooted from a non-Indian environment and placed in an Indian one.[42]  The Oklahoma Supreme Court concluded that ICWA only applies when Indian children are removed from existing Indian family environments.[43]       South Dakota adopted the existing Indian family exception in 1987 in Claymore v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
[J.] be uprooted from a non-Indian environment and placed in an Indian one.[42]  The Oklahoma Supreme Court concluded that ICWA only applies when Indian children are removed from existing Indian family environments.[43]       South Dakota adopted the existing Indian family exception in 1987 in Claymore v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:22 pm by Gene Quinn
During a comparable span (1981-1986) drawn from the Berger Court years, the Chamber’s win ratio was just 43%. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:56 pm by INFORRM
       ABDUL MUNEEM PATEL v (1) JR BOOKS (2) JEREMY ROBSON (3) GORDON THOMAS (4) ROB KIRKPATRICK  17/2/2010 43. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:29 pm by Schachtman
  The p-value does not permit a probabilistic assessment of the correctness of the null hypothesis; nor does it permit a straightforward probabilistic assessment of the correctness of the alternative hypothesis of rejecting the null hypothesis. [read post]