Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B" Results 3541 - 3560 of 5,815
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
If a person is a professional representative, then his/her employment status simply should not matter. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
 Earlier this year, at [2012] EWHC 1722 (Ch), Arnold J said Interflora could call witnesses from the first exercise but not from the second exercise. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 1:31 am by GuestPost
There are no longer any excuses: legislation must be introduced as a matter of urgency. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 11:43 pm by David
., the lack of an initial sound) and 21 consonants: b, p, m, f, d, t, n, lz, c, s, zh, ch, sh, r g, k, h, j, q, x The boldfaced, underlined consonants pose a challenge for the native speaker of English, but later I'll explain a way to think about them that I find useful. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
i.andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp; Suitability The sale of unsuitable investments is actionable under Rule 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act ofandnbsp; 1934, SEC Rule 10b-5.andnbsp; This body of law is premised, in part, on the New York Stock Exchange Rule 405- andldquo;Know Your Customerandrdquo; rule, and is also set forth in FINRAandrsquo;s Conduct Rule IM-2310, which states that:andnbsp; andldquo;In recommending to a customer the… [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 2:53 am
Relying principally on certain obiter dicta in Nicholas v Nicholas [1984] FLR 285, Moylan, J. made this order. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:18 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 12-0080, 2012 MT 246, B BAR J RANCH, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Now, in Rivers v Birnbaum   2012 NY Slip Op 06935   Decided on October 17, 2012   Appellate Division, Second Department   Belen, J. the uncertainty is over. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:57 am by Robichaud
Justices LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abel, Moldaver and Karakatsanis JJ. concurring in reasons and Cromwell J. dissenting. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:57 am by Robichaud
Justices LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abel, Moldaver and Karakatsanis JJ. concurring in reasons and Cromwell J. dissenting. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 7:27 pm by Jon G. Brooks
The Chair of the San Jose Chapter 13 Committee—a group of bankruptcy attorneys representing debtors in Silicon Valley—recently asked me and several of my colleagues to give presentations to the committee on the history of bankruptcy and debt in various cultures. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 5:26 am by Andrew Frisch
The issue is whether, under the statute, there may be, as a matter of law, and if so whether there is as a matter of fact, a retail concept in the defendants’ business, notwithstanding the Secretary’s determination. [read post]