Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 6,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 4:13 am
Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:58 am
Mix, Indictment, supra ¶;¶ 17-20. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 10:47 am
” The court held (at para 149) that though auctions are not the only manner in which natural resources can be alienated, the state’s methods of alienating natural resources can be tested on the touchstone of “arbitrariness”.While we’re on the subject of the 2G case, I thought I should point out that in Center for Public Interest Litigation v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 11:22 am
Summers v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:45 am
(U.S., Feb. 27, 2013); Comcast v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:40 am
Complaint ¶ 89, Cruz Lopez v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:45 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier SA et al., Joined Cases C-236/08 to C-238/08, at paras. 112-120; L’Oreal v. eBay, Case C-324/09, at paras. 111-17. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:05 am
See id. at para. 37, 38 (citing English v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 9:28 am
He states that you take regular medication. [read post]
27 May 2013, 9:28 am
He states that you take regular medication. [read post]
27 May 2013, 4:18 am
However, I cannot see how Mrs Sig could be so liable, in the light of her state of mind as summarised in para 22 above. [read post]
22 May 2013, 11:34 am
Even the most-forgiving view of Iqbal is that the state of mind required for supervisory liability matches the state of mind required for the underlying right. [read post]
21 May 2013, 1:05 pm
Order ¶18. [read post]
21 May 2013, 10:11 am
He stated at para 20 of his decision that only the issue of identification was in play in relation to the three luring counts. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:45 am
He stated at para 20 of his decision that only the issue of identification was in play in relation to the three luring counts. [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:03 am
The court a quo justified its approach in para 26 by stating:"In my view, in order for a Court to make an appropriate and correct finding, it must undertake such an exercise keeping in mind, of course, the relevant importance of the first and general impression.If a Court does not undertake that exercise and relies solely on a first and general impression, it runs the risk of failing to distinguish between unlawful passing off and lawful competition." [read post]
19 May 2013, 1:00 pm
This a late note on OR -v- Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and Isle of Anglesey CC [2013] UKUT 065 (AAC) because, bluntly, I had read it quickly at the time and overlooked its broader significance.The issue was whether OR could receive housing benefit for his stays in a night shelter hostel. [read post]
