Search for: "People v Legall" Results 3541 - 3560 of 30,853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2009, 8:31 am
Here at the Glom, we often post on topics such as women in the legal profession and working parents. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on November 3, 2010 in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:02 am by Philip Thomas
Ironically, most people credit Florida attorney Willie Gary for that verdict even though he avoided the fee dispute. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am by Ronald Collins
Finding the right words was not rhetorical ornamentation: it was the very essence of his work of thinking through a complex legal problem. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
 There is, from the point of view of legal principle, no difference between defamatory publication on social media and defamatory publication in the mainstream media. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 9:56 am by Eric Goldman
” This case would have better fitted into the Roommates.com standard when a defendant adds illegality to otherwise-legal third party content. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 11:59 am by Giles Peaker
AB & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Westminster City Council (2024) EWHC 266 (Admin) This was a judicial review of both the suitability of accommodation provided to a homeless couple, and also of Westminster’s policy of sourcing temporary accommodation, which was claimed to indirectly discriminate against disabled people. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:17 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
**Returning to the Azure case, there were other legal issues. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 12:36 pm by Christine Hurt
  "So I am concerned about the 5 hours, about the lack of recusal for cause, about the very, very brief questions that he provided to people who had said on the questionnaire they could be -- they could be biased. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 5:30 am
The proposal is directly at odds with Rubin v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 7:12 am by James Eckert
A verdict is repugnant if an acquittal on one charge conclusively negates a necessary element of a crime for which the defendant was convicted (People v Tucker, 55 NY2d 1 [1981]). [read post]