Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 3541 - 3560
of 16,401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
Do South Dakota v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:47 pm
Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:20 am
State v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 4:02 pm
He reaffirmed the Court of Appeal’s finding in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1373 that the defendant’s state of mind is irrelevant to the tort of misuse of private information. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:06 am
" United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
” To name a few: The report recommends ensuring the independence and professional protection of the “540F judge advocate” while sustaining the ability of the current convening authority to submit a statement outlining his or her considered opinion about how the crime and its prosecution affects discipline, efficiency, and morale; the report highlights the need for an independent “court administrative office,” like the U.K. uses, to manage arranging for the venue, timing… [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:19 am
Warner stands for a proposition about which we have written many times: it can be awfully tough for minority members to establish grounds for judicial dissolution of a New York LLC. [read post]
10 May 2020, 8:01 am
” Coons v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 4:16 pm
” Blisset v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 7:05 am
Shak v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:25 am
State v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 9:51 am
On December 19, she received a notice stating that the board would address her employment status during a closed meeting on December 21. [read post]
6 May 2020, 2:35 pm
In the meantime, he (1) gets married, and (2) the minor child grows up and moves out. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm
Instead, Pelosi and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy agreed to work on the issue with a bipartisan group of lawmakers that includes the majority and minority leadership as well as the chairpersons and ranking minority members of the rules and administration committees. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:51 am
The subcommittee staff’s analysis of the constitutionality of remote voting and participation focused heavily on whether a proposed change to the Senate’s rules, or the adoption of a new rule, would comply with the three-part test the Supreme Court established in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:20 am
Part V of this Article reviews cases in which a denial of minority status to a petitioner seeking Minority Business Enterprise status has been adjudicated and resulted in a published opinion. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:03 am
Johnston's opinion yesterday in Williams v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 10:35 am
State v. [read post]
