Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. " Results 3541 - 3560 of 8,925
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2017, 9:06 am by Edward Smith
  Berkeley, California: A Vibrant Past I’m Ed Smith, a personal injury attorney in Berkeley. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:06 am by Monika Zdzieborska
In the US, (i) Case3:15-cr-00201-WHO, United States of America v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm by Tommy Tobin
The three judge DeCoster appeals panel issued a three-opinion ruling, with the majority advancing a concept of responsible corporate officer liability arising from the FDCA and the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
United States, holding that the advisory federal sentencing guidelines are not subject to vagueness challenges under the due process clause. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 11:49 am by petrocohen
  Almost 150,000 judges and lawyers across the United States have participated in the American Inns of Court program. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 8:46 am by Quinta Jurecic
Executive Order Protecting The Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into The United States EXECUTIVE ORDER - - - - - - - PROTECTING THE NATION FROM FOREIGN TERRORIST ENTRY INTO THE UNITED STATES        By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., and… [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
” And finally, on January 20, 2017, in apparent accordance with Article II, Section I, Clause 8, “Before he enter[ed] on the execution of his office, he [took] the following oath or affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear . . . that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
As the New York Times reports, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument this week in Packingham v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
As the New York Times reports, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument this week in Packingham v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Title IX states that “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be . [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 11:42 am by Phillips & Associates
We help our clients assert claims for religious discrimination and other unlawful practices under the laws of New York City, the State of New York, and the United States of America. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 7:00 am by Jacques Berlinerblau
They were buoyed by Justice William Rehnquist’s 1985 dissent in Wallace v. [read post]