Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 3541 - 3560 of 10,389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2017, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
United States President Trump has successfully resisted an appeal against the dismissal of a libel claim by political strategist, Cheryl Jacobus. [read post]
  It is, rather, a disapproval of the position itself pursuant to a law enacted by the democratically-elected representatives of the People of the United States declaring that “such rule shall have no force and effect. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
To mark yesterday’s anniversary of the Supreme Court’s 2000 decision in Bush v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 10:04 pm by Afro-Buff
  First, with regard to acquiescence, section 48 of the Trade Marks Act of 1994 states the following: “(1) Where the proprietor of an earlier trade mark or other earlier right has acquiesced for a continuous period of five years in the use of a registered trade mark in the United Kingdom, being aware of that use, there shall cease to be any entitlement on the basis of that earlier trade mark or other right— to apply for… [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 11:24 am by Steven Cohen
Midsun Group, Inc – United States District Court – District of Connecticut – December 7th, 2017) involves a claim of trademark infringement. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
CBS News is reporting that an official of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and his wife suffered from a similar attack as the diplomats in Cuba. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
The entire statement is reprinted below: Supreme Court of the United States Christopher Anthony Floyd v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices considered the limits of tax-law obstruction-of-justice charges. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 9:00 pm by Lesley Wexler
The Convention on Conventional Weapons Protocol V (on Explosive Remnants of War) also regulates US use of cluster munitions, as it is a state party to this international treaty. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:19 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  That proposed section contains an incorrect and misleading statement of the law regarding environmental baseline issues, in conflict with holdings of the Fifth District’s recent decision in Association of Irritated Residents v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices considered the limits of tax-law obstruction-of-justice charges. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]