Search for: "Bui v. State"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 9,822
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2016, 6:33 am
State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:40 am
As Noel Erinjeri pointed out at Fault Lines, the Supreme Court in Bearden v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
” Justice Emerson didn’t buy the argument by a long shot, pointing out initially that, under the January 2004 Amended Operating Agreement, no member could voluntarily withdraw for two years, i.e., before January 2006. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
” Justice Emerson didn’t buy the argument by a long shot, pointing out initially that, under the January 2004 Amended Operating Agreement, no member could voluntarily withdraw for two years, i.e., before January 2006. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
” Justice Emerson didn’t buy the argument by a long shot, pointing out initially that, under the January 2004 Amended Operating Agreement, no member could voluntarily withdraw for two years, i.e., before January 2006. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
Rev. 1891 was not her first commentary on Edison and the light bulb.For example, one has the 2010 post New light from an old source, which includes the text:Contrary to popular wisdom, however, Edison’s team was merely one of dozens that co-invented electric light bulb.Scientifically speaking, his team’s discoveries were neither the first, nor the most important.What Edison did better than all the other inventors took place not in the laboratory, but in the law office.His lawyers… [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 9:30 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 11:21 am
But were that the state of the evidence, well, it is what it is. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:16 am
He does not buy the majority’s general deterrence rationale. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
Constitution.V.L. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is called Verghetta v Lawlor, and you can read here Justice Scheinkman’s 33-page post-trial decision dated March 9, 2016, the opening paragraph of which aptly sets the stage for the fair-value drama that follows, starring dueling appraisals over two thousand percent apart: This Court is called upon to determine the value of two corporate entities for purposes of permitting the buy-out of a minority shareholder. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 10:05 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 6:16 am
The court also granted the state human rights agency’s motion to intervene (Wilson v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:06 am
Jae Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 9:59 am
Registration is available through state governments and the U.S.P.T.O. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 10:01 am
That other case, Samsung Electronics v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am
Reese v Newman In a decision last month by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in Reese v Newman, No. 14-CV-283 [D.C. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am
Reese v Newman In a decision last month by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in Reese v Newman, No. 14-CV-283 [D.C. [read post]
