Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 3561 - 3580 of 48,955
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2010, 4:01 am by traceydennis
R (Perinpanathan) v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court and another [2010] EWCA Civ 40; [2010] WLR (D) 26 “A magistrates’ court exercising its discretion under s 64(1) of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 ‘to make an order for costs … as it thinks just and reasonable’  in relation to forfeiture proceedings successfully defended was entitled to refuse to order the police to pay the costs on the ground that they had acted… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:19 am by Gene Killian
” I thought of that definition when I read the recent decision in in CV Ice Company v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 4:13 am by Ben
 The Haiti earthquake aftermath  by Daniel MorelAnd finally, following on from our recent blog on the award of $5.6 million in legal fees and costs against Perfect 10, photographer Daniel Morel has failed in an attempt to be awarded legal costs, despite being awarded $1.2 million by a jury in 2013 after his photos from the Haiti earthquake were widely distributed by news agencies Agence France-Presse (AFP)  and Getty after he put them on Twitter:… [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:06 am
His reasoning was that "it does not seem to me either sound in principle or desirable that the assured should be penalised if it might be said that those costs were also incurred to obtain some further or additional benefit. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 11:38 am
 It should have given the bid to me, even though my $5 million-plus bid would have cost the City over a half-million dollars more! [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 12:12 pm
 This time it's on the hook for paying the criminal defense costs for various members of the board of directors of the San Diego City Employees' Retirement System.No chump change, either. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 11:08 am by David Y. Trevor
  A sincere religious belief, even if non-traditional or highly idiosyncratic, must often be reasonably accommodated by the employer, as recently demonstrated in EEOC v. [read post]