Search for: "DOE v. Smith" Results 3561 - 3580 of 6,569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2009, 6:42 am
More importantly, though, in Hampshire Police Authority v Smith [2009] EWHC 174 (Admin), the Divisional Court held that an appeal against a closure order has to be issued within 21 days from the date of the closure order. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:50 am by Daniel Schwartz
#cbftech @JenLaviano Fav SCOTUS dissent: Blackmun's "Poor Joshua" in DeShaney v Winnebego Cty #cbftech; made me cry when I read it in law school; still does My sincere thanks to all that participated in the contest and spreading word about this great program. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  The statement “Mr Smith is a disgrace”, although evaluative, fails to identify what the remark is about. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:35 pm
The statute reviewed was essentially the same one the United States Supreme Court reviewed in Smith v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
The Appellant does assert a power to notify under Article 50(2) notwithstanding that that will result in changes to domestic law. [read post]
24 May 2020, 6:27 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Regardless, Justice Smith sought judicial review before the Federal Court in Smith v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
The patents were held valid and infringed.* Television Show Fan Does Not Own Facebook Likes. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:21 am by Alex Phipps
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See In re Smith, 714 F.2d 1127, 1135 (Fed.Cir.1983) ("The experimental use exception . . . does not include market testing where the inventor is attempting to gauge consumer demand for his claimed invention. [read post]