Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2010, 3:48 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 1:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
It is not sufficient that the repute would lead people in England to visit the venue when they visited Paris (Alain Bernardin et Cie v Pavilion Properties Ltd [1967] RPC 581). [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
By Mark A. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the court’s recent decision to review National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 8:35 am
Hewlett-Packard Company v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:31 pm
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1,17–18 (1966); United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:10 pm
On July 30, 2009, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled against convicted peace protestors in Tataz, et al. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Decided on April 26, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department MARK C. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Decided on April 26, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department MARK C. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:33 pm
In the Hermès v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 12:52 am
Floyd LJ summarised it as "the criterion which the law has adopted for determining whether a foreign website which is accessible from the state in which the trade mark is protected should be treated as using a sign in the course of trade in relation to goods or services in that state. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 9:37 am
| Friday Fantasies| Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One)| HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio| Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme| Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:46 pm
Pulse Electronics and Stryker Corp. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 1:15 pm
In US Dairy Export Council v Consorzio Per La Tutela Del Formaggio Asiago [2020] ATMO 45, the Consortium attempted to register ASIAGO as a certification mark in class 29 for cheese, which would have allowed them to control the use of the term in the Australian market. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v Munir and anor, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
The second is whether diverging legal frameworks between Member States hamper the principle of free movement of goods. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am
Last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:55 am
Likewise, the relevant public displayed a relatively high level of attention with regard to veterinary preparations because they affected the state of health of animals. [read post]
