Search for: "Matter of Kennedy"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 4,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2019, 7:20 am
Scalia was next on the spectrum, with Justice Samuel Alito and Chief Justice John Roberts a little further down the scale, along with former Justice Anthony Kennedy. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:07 am
So outright acquittal as a matter of law does not appear to be an option here. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
(Though since the decision came out last June, it’s not clear why one extra day matters.) [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:23 pm
Insights: an audio or video where partners explaining why the cases matter. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 10:13 am
” (Call this move by the challengers the “get Justice Kennedy’s vote” approach.) [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:46 am
The matter was remanded to the appellate court for a ruling on the merits of Anderson’s appeal. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 10:13 pm
Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1994) (Kennedy, J., concurring). [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:06 am
Niamh Kennedy reports for CNN. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 8:00 am
No matter what their interests are or how they may actually be affected by the decision, they are all stakeholders. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 2:59 am
Department of Agriculture achieved cabinet-level status in 1889.With the especially close Nov. 5 general election only a couple months away, in all likelihood, a new Secretary of Agriculture will be appointed in a matter of months no matter whether voters pick Romney or Obama. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Before John Roberts and Neil Gorsuch sided with LGBT rights, so did Sandra Day O’Connor, Anthony Kennedy, and D [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 10:45 am
Standard works (Kennedy's CIF Contracts) and decisions [Johnson v Taylor Bros (1920) AC 144, 155] recognise the following as features of CIF contractsCIF contracts relate to carriage of goods by sea. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:48 am
They were instructed by Howard Kennedy LLP. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 4:01 pm
From the AP story: UNC law professor Joseph Kennedy: "If these allegations are true and if they don't justify disbarment, then I'm not sure what does. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm
Kennedy Jr. argued that requiring public comments for these types of matters was not statutorily required by the Administrative Procedure Act and was too costly for the Department. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 5:55 am
Kennedy, Jr.). [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 10:15 am
I will have more to say about these matters in due course. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:32 am
As a matter of public policy, the Court should conform to Marsy’s Law and determine the banks to be victims, and thus be permitted to receive restitution. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
In other words, if faced with the opportunity to overrule a precedent, most Justices usually vote exactly as they would if facing the issue as an original matter. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Solicitor General to review the matter. [read post]
