Search for: "May v. May" Results 3561 - 3580 of 182,348
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2021, 1:33 pm by Harmony Taylor
Today, Tuesday, May 18, 2021, the NC Court of Appeals issued its decision in C Investments 2, LLC v Auger. [read post]
18 May 2021, 1:12 pm by Michael Taliercio
Today, Tuesday, May 18, 2021, the NC Court of Appeals issued its decision in Executive Office Park of Durham Association, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:21 am
Failing to appear at an administrative hearing may have adverse consequencesAures v Buffalo Board of Education, 272 AD2d 664The Aures decision demonstrates the problem that could result if a party fails to appear at an administrative hearing as scheduled -- the hearing officer may hold the hearing in absentia and the determination will be binding on the parties. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 8:08 am by Dennis Crouch
 See Oracle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 4:24 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) B, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 906 (07 May 2009) Athwal & Ors, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 789 (07 May 2009) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Baynes v Hedger & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 374 (07 May 2009) Annabel’s (Berkeley Square) Ltd & Ors v Revenue and Customs [2009] EWCA Civ 361 (07 May [...] [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:25 pm by Florian Mueller
 1, the App Store antitrust bench trial will start on Monday, May 3, 2021 (this post continues below the document):21-03-02 Epic Games v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
A public officer of a town, village, improvement district or fire district   officer by court may be removed from his or her office pursuant to Public Officers Law §36Becallo v Zambrano, 2015 NY Slip Op 07091, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentPublic Officers Law §36 was enacted to enable a town, a village, an improvement district or a fire district to remove a public officer found to be an unfaithful or dishonest public official. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 8:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
An employer may seek summary judgment in human rights action by offering a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason rebutting allegations of unlawful discrimination  Tibbetts v Pelham Union Free School Dist., 2016 NY Slip Op 06699, Appellate Division, Second Department§296(1)(a) of the New York State Human Rights Law provides that "[i]t shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice . . . [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
A disciplinary hearing officer may not consider disciplinary charges and specifications not preferred against an employeeNitti v County of Tioga, 2017 NY Slip Op 02868, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe appointing authority brought disciplinary charges against an employee [Petitioner]  alleging that she, among other things, made three false statements to a subordinate employee and to the appointing authority about her friend's Medicaid application. [read post]