Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 29,283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2019, 3:28 am
In Gundy v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:44 am
(A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:14 am
Trump v. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 1:09 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 8:27 am
Today we commemorate the 47th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 6:00 am
On July 7, two whistleblowers sent a letter to Congress alleging “gross mismanagement and specific endangerment to public health and safety” at an Emergency Intake Site (EIS) in Texas. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 10:26 am
H.R. 1149 takes aim at unaccompanied children by weakening their right to counsel, and states that "access to counsel" suffices. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:55 pm
Constitution by Congress and the President. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:12 am
This week, the United States Supreme Court issued a long-awaited ruling in Young v. [read post]
14 Nov 2005, 1:16 pm
This Section grants to Congress the power to establish "uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
Circuit decision in Environmental Defense, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 11:25 am
Textually, I argue, the Indian Commerce Clause and Indians Not Taxed Clause serve as express authorization for Congress to create legal classifications based on Indian race and ancestry, so long as those classifications are not arbitrary, as the Supreme Court stated a century ago in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:17 am
I argue that, textually, the Indian Commerce Clause and Indians Not Taxed Clause serve as express authorization for Congress to create legal classifications based on Indian race and ancestry, so long as those classifications are not arbitrary, as the Supreme Court stated a century ago in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:07 am
In the recent case of United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 11:24 am
In HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 8:25 am
The authors also note that if the Supreme Court comes to the "wrong conclusion" patients injured by defective medical devices have a remedy in Congress (who, by the way, have never to my knowledge questioned the Court's holding in Medtronic v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 8:25 am
The authors also note that if the Supreme Court comes to the "wrong conclusion" patients injured by defective medical devices have a remedy in Congress (who, by the way, have never to my knowledge questioned the Court's holding in Medtronic v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:45 am
Congress can quickly add what it wishes. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:38 pm
The en banc decision of the Court of Military Commission Review (“CMCR”) in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
United States v. [read post]
