Search for: "State v. Favors" Results 3561 - 3580 of 37,555
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
They subsequently withdrew all claims except for their allegation contending that their First Amendment rights had been violated by the Village and the other named defendants.As to Plaintiffs’ First Amendment claims, the District Court granted summary judgment in favor of all of the defendants, explaining that Plaintiffs’ First Amendment claims were barred as they were made only pursuant to the defendants’ performing official duties and thus Plaintiffs’ allegations… [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, said the court, this case was governed by the rule of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, 376 US 254, in which the Supreme Court of the United States interpreted the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as embodying "the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 6:24 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  The case is from the Amarillo Court of Appeals and is styled, State Farm Lloyds v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:33 am by Andrew Hamm
Hinton State Laboratory Institute – which later employed Dookhan – produced three “certificates of analysis” stating that the bags contained cocaine. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:14 pm by Juan Antunez
Under the right circumstances a federal judge can always stay its case in favor of a parallel state-court proceeding. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 7:07 am
Bryan Corbin of the Evansville Courier & Press reports today on yesterday's 3-2 Supreme Court decision in State of Indiana v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 4:50 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court handed down a controversial decision upholding the President’s latest travel ban in the case Trump, President of the United States, Et Al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 4:50 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court handed down a controversial decision upholding the President’s latest travel ban in the case Trump, President of the United States, Et Al. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 11:58 am by Matt Cooper
Supreme Court after rulings in favor of the defendants at the courts below. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 7:00 am by Matt Cooper
Supreme Court after rulings in favor of the defendants at the courts below. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 2:02 am
The defendants claimed that they were entitled to statutory immunity for the state law claims but the court rejected that as a basis for summary judgment because on the facts taken in the light most favorable to Sykes there was evidence sufficient for a jury to find actual malice, which would preclude qualified immunity. [read post]