Search for: "State v. So "
Results 3561 - 3580
of 117,972
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2015, 5:18 pm
State, 111 So.3d 973 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) and Horsley v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:38 pm
In the case of United States of America v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 5:41 am
State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:23 pm
Christen v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 8:27 am
United States, No. 22-53 Lakshmi Arunachalam v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 8:16 am
The previous leading authority on “white list” designation was R (Javed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] EWCA Civ 789. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 3:40 pm
Spivey v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:19 am
Tussey v ABB, Inc., an excessive fee and revenue sharing case decided on the last day of March after a full trial before the United States District Court for the District of Western Missouri, is a remarkable decision, imposing extensive liability for acts involving the costs of and revenue sharing for a major plan, on the basis of extensive and detailed fact finding. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 11:55 am
Various Coins; United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 9:57 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 8:33 am
Pangloss should not be so flippant or indeed, so late.The HL Constitutional Committee issued a Call for Evidence in late April on "the impact that government surveillance and data collection have upon the privacy of citizens and their relationship with the State. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:21 pm
See Bell v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:07 pm
A little while back, I was considering whether to undertake an empirical study into whether law enforcement officers were relying on the inventory-search exception to the warrant requirement more often after the United States Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Arizona v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 7:57 am
We've been asked two questions repeatedly since the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 1:55 pm
However, the court reversed the district court's finding of contempt because the challenged conduct, filing a new ANDA seeking to sell another generic version of divalproex, was not within the literal scope of the original injunction, as it was not one of the enumerated actions.More detail of Abbott Labs. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:50 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States has issued an important class certification decision, and it is not Dukes v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
., P.C. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
This is particularly so in the case of counsel becoming involved at a later stage of the claim. [read post]
County of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles County Employee Relations Commission: Opinion To Issue Tomorrow
29 May 2013, 12:10 pm
In County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
