Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 3561 - 3580 of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
According to the campaign: A new bill in Congress makes posting a video containing any copyrighted work a felony– with up to 5 years in prison. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
CFPB, the Court held that Congress violated the Constitution when it created the structure of the important Consumer Protection Financial Bureau after the 2007 economic crisis. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
  This Protect, Respect and Remedy: A Framework for Business and Human Rights Protect[2](hereafter “Framework”), along with its companion Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights:  Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy Framework,”[3] (hereafter “Guiding Principles”) was adopted by the UN Human Rights Council in June 2011 as “a new set of Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights… [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:55 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 9:54 am by Holly Brezee
Moreover, Applicants sometimes file “continuation” applications to pursue aspects of the invention that weren’t protected in an earlier application. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 2:13 am by Keith Mallinson
Many in the cellular industry—who unsurprisingly like the idea of lower prices for something they assimilate and must pay for rather than that they create or sell—have lapped this up. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
[v] Consumer discretionary companies, (i.e., retailers, restaurants) are more sensitive to challenging economic conditions and often have a balance sheet full of illiquid assets (i.e., employees, product inventory and commercial real estate). [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
[v] Consumer discretionary companies, (i.e., retailers, restaurants) are more sensitive to challenging economic conditions and often have a balance sheet full of illiquid assets (i.e., employees, product inventory and commercial real estate). [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:04 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Over the next three decades, the Court employed the Lochner doctrine of “liberty of contract” to strike down numerous attempts by state governments to exercise their police power to improve working conditions or protect consumers. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 9:41 am by Eric Goldman
Article 19.17 doesn’t include an analogue to Section 230(d), an outmoded and irrelevant provision that requires consumer disclosures about filtering technology. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:29 am by Erica Canas
It is also part of a broader legal shift towards accountability and consumer protection. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:17 am by Carolyn Elefant
Regulating marketing-based speech by lawyers is one matter – personally, I don’t like it but advertising isn’t accorded the same level of protection as political or expressive speech. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
You don’t need an NDA (Intellectual Property Directions) Is everything obvious? [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 2:40 pm by Michael Grossman
Manufacturers Are on the Hook I don’t want to have to say this, but it’s important: Big companies don’t create warnings because they care about protecting their customers. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 10:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Perhaps an obligation to sue 3d parties on your behalf to protect exclusivity. [read post]