Search for: "United States v. Lively" Results 3561 - 3580 of 11,369
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2022, 2:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff went on to graduate from high school and enlist in the United States Marine Corps in 2005. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:43 am by David Pozen
”  Wait, sorry, had the wrong document there…  The actual text of the operative clause provides in full: “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:28 am by David Pozen
”  Wait, sorry, had the wrong document there…  The actual text of the operative clause provides in full: “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 3:04 pm by Sever | Storey
  Condemnation for Private Developments In 2005, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled on a case called Kelo v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 4:14 pm
In turn, this relationship provides evidence of a connection between the child and the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The Bladensburg Peace CrossThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that a cross-shaped monument may be preserved on public land because it does not violate the Constitution's Establishment Clause.Cultural property watchers may not have noticed the case of American Legion et al. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:01 am by By Chase Strangio, Staff Attorney, ACLU
Then, like Edie Windsor who successfully challenged the constitutionality of the so-called Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
United States, 156 U.S. 432, 453 (1895). [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The Black Hills, the oldest mountain range in the United States, stretches across South Dakota and Wyoming. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 9:20 pm
Dec. 870 (1992) (mere status as the sole occupant of girlfriend’s mother’s residence at time of search is not sufficient to establish a legitimate expectation of privacy); United States v. [read post]