Search for: "ACTAVIS" Results 341 - 360 of 1,005
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2017, 9:58 pm by Patent Docs
Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. et al. v Janssen Oncology, Inc. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:21 am by Brian Cordery
Lilly argue direct infringement on the footing that, when properly construed Actavis’ products do fall within claim 1 of the patent, in view of the equivalence between pemetrexed disodium and the salt forms Actavis use. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 12:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Carrier, Rutgers Law School has written on Pleading Standards: The Hidden Threat to Actavis. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
 Tune in LIVE for tomorrow's Eli Lilly v Actavis Supreme Court showdownThe Supreme Court was live online to hear Tom Mitcheson QC (supported by  Andrew Waugh QC and leading Stuart Baran) for Eli Lilly against Danny Alexander QC (leading Thomas Raphael QC) for Actavis.Oldie but goldie - when is old prior art a suitable starting point for inventive step analysis? [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 10:32 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Defendants are Actavis LLC of Parsippany, New Jersey; Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. of North Wales, Pennsylvania; and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. of Petach Tikva, Israel. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 10:32 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Defendants are Actavis LLC of Parsippany, New Jersey; Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. of North Wales, Pennsylvania; and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. of Petach Tikva, Israel. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 4 April until Thursday 6 April, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, and other cases. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:35 am
 Interestingly, MSD amended its patent to include a new claim 17 upon which it relied to protect the product for the purposes of obtaining the SPC, but didn't rely upon it at trial (c.f with the position in Actavis v Boehringer [2013] EWHC 2927 at [10]). [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
" Here are some key findings: In 2016, 4,537 patent cases were filed -- a 22% decline from 2015 (5,819 cases) The Eastern District of Texas continues to lead the nation with 1,662 cases – nearly 37% of all cases filed, yet a 34% decrease over the district’s 2015 total (2,541 cases) This is the fourth year in a row that Judge Gilstrap had the most patent cases of any judge Samsung again leads LG Electronics and Apple as the most-sued patent defendant in 2016 Tech… [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:38 am by Brian Cordery
Referring to its own decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly ([2015] EWCA Civ 555; [2015] Bus LR 1068), the Court took this opportunity to comment on the impossible burden that reliance on prosecution history places on the skilled reader if it were to be recognised as a legitimate aid to construction. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 11:25 pm
In referring the question on Art 3(a) as to what was required for a product to be protected by a basic patent, he stated that he was “encouraged by what the [CJEU] said in Actavis v Sanofi and Actavis v Boehringer to believe that there is a realistic prospect of the Court providing further and better guidance to that which it has hitherto provided” (para 91). [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
 This was Andrew’s characterisation of the riddle faced by Birss J in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2016] EWHC 1955 (Pat). [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 12:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Fischman, University of Virginia School of Law discusses The Circular Logic of Actavis. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 11:21 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
") And an article titled "THE CIRCULAR LOGIC OF ACTAVIS " has: n129. [read post]