Search for: "APPLICATION OF GARRETT"
Results 341 - 360
of 393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2010, 7:08 am
Terrell & Garrett, Inc., that the similar liberal construction mandate in the DTPA requires that the statute be given "its most comprehensive application possible without doing any violence to its terms. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 8:29 am
Here too it seems that there is no rocket science, but rather the application of common sense and sound contract principles to the needs of the respective parties. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 9:17 pm
(Sean Garrett) FCC chair Julius Genachowski and his commission comrades are the It tech policy policy body in DC these days. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 1:06 pm
Because each of the four factors were present, the court in Leor had little difficulty in concluding that plaintiff did not meet his burden of establishing the applicability of the attorney-client privilege. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:06 am
Because each of the four factors were present, the court in Leor had little difficulty in concluding that plaintiff did not meet his burden of establishing the applicability of the attorney-client privilege. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 5:22 pm
The Garrett Amendment to the House legislation would change the name of the PCAOB to Auditor Oversight Board. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 11:09 am
One after another, the justices prodded Bilski's lawyer, Michael Jakes of Finnegan Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, in search of some idea about where to draw the line. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:32 pm
Michael Jakes of Finnegan, Henderson, Farrabow, Garrett & Dunner, arguing in favor of the patent at issue, said one benefit of patenting innovations is public disclosure, Justice Sonia Sotomayor countered that patents in fact "limit the free flow of information. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 11:12 am
Michael Jakes of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner in Washington, and arguing for David J. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Compliance with such standards is incompatible with the "actual malice" standard ordinarily applicable to punitive damages. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 11:10 am
Garrett, there is a place for federal oversight, but the weighty cost of compliance under Section 404 is slowly strangling small businesses. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
Tex. 2009) (investigator's license); Garrett v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 5:42 pm
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. issued a press release last week discussing the abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) containing a Paragraph IV certification for COPAXONE ® (glatiramer acetate injection), filed by Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 3:09 pm
On August 28, 2009, the International Trade Commission issued a notice denying an application filed by Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP ("Finnegan") for review of an August 6 order issued by ALJ E. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 7:54 am
Robert Young of the Merck Frosst Center for Therapeutic Research wrote two articles about the processes behind Singulair before its application to the PTO was made. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) BPAI uses dictionary published six years after filing date in rejecting claims: Ex Parte Davis (Gray on Claims) BPAI rejects claims, finding PHOSITA would have to make speculative assumptions concerning the meaning of claim language: Ex parte Brune (Gray on Claims) ITC reverses Remand Initial Determination and finds no violation in investigation relating to coolants brought by INEOS against Sinochem (ITC 337 Law Blog) US Patents –… [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 7:56 am
He brought in new lawyers from the Washington, D.C., IP powerhouse Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner and petitioned the U.S. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:59 pm
Funny, at a time when the public is highly critical of the Treasury - clearly linked to our sucky economy - job applicants to fill some of the highest positions have been few and far between. [read post]
11 May 2009, 9:00 pm
Garrett (2001) and Kimel v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:40 am
Garrett, 116 N.C. 848, 21 S.E. 679 (1895). [read post]
