Search for: "ATES V. STATE" Results 341 - 360 of 859
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2014, 5:05 am by Gilles Cuniberti
Here are some resources: Argentina’s petition NML’s opposition Argentina’s reply The United States’s amicus brief Argentina’s supplemental brief NML’s supplemental brief SCOTUSBlog’s case page Related posts:French Supreme Court Upholds Argentina’s Immunity despite Waiver Another ATS Case Seeking Supreme Court Review Will the U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 5:58 am by Yishai Schwartz
In Alien Tort Statute news: John pointed us to the DOJ’s amicus brief urging the Second Circuit to affirm the dismissal of an ATS lawsuit against former Mexican President (and current Yale professor) Ernesto Zedillo based on the State Department’s suggestion of immunity. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
As the Cali- fornia Supreme Court has stated, “[n]either the language of the UCL nor its legislative history provides any basis for concluding the Legislature intended the UCL to oper- ate extraterritorially. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 7:00 am by Nick Basciano
It was a big Alien Tort Statute week too:  John discussed a recent Ninth Circuit decision that will allow the ATS case Doe v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:03 pm by John Bellinger
On December 19, a panel of the Ninth Circuit issued a brief order in the long-running Doe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 10:08 am by Trey Childress
On December 19, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an order in the case of Doe I v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 7:51 pm by John Bellinger
 The amendment also specifically states that it is intended to apply extraterritorially. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 3:47 pm
Dean stated that he was at the house regularly to work on it, and that he sometimes ate and slept there. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 7:10 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
The government relies, as it did in the court below (and as the district court did), on the 1949 case of United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
  In the case of Daimler/Chrysler AG v. [read post]