Search for: "Abbott v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 923
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2017, 7:20 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In an exceedingly brief Order signed only by Associate Justice Samuel Alito, the United States Supreme Court in Abbott v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:48 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
And so, when Governor Abbott said "Okay, I'm gonna rescind those fees", all of the sudden, DPS is looking at a very significant shortfall. [read post]
TUTSA, as amended, is now one of the most modern and comprehensive laws governing trade secrets in the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
—Humberto Morales Moreno, Universidad Autonoma de Puebla  Author Meets Reader: Carol Steiker & Jordan Steiker, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital PunishmentTue, 6/20: 12:45 PM  - 2:30 PM – Sheraton Maria Isabel Imperio C (2nd Floor) ·         Authors—Carol Steiker, Harvard Law School and Jordan Steiker, University of Texas School of Law   ·        … [read post]
24 May 2017, 8:36 am by Steven Cohen
 ABBOTT LABORATORIES – United States District Court – Eastern District of new York – May 22nd, 2017) involves the drug Depakote. [read post]
24 May 2017, 8:36 am by Steven Cohen
 ABBOTT LABORATORIES – United States District Court – Eastern District of new York – May 22nd, 2017) involves the drug Depakote. [read post]
7 May 2017, 7:04 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Friedrich, until recently a member of the United States Sentencing Commission, to the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia; Magistrate Judge Terry F. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Medrad, on the other hand, argues that this Court does not have the authority to dismiss its invalidity and unenforceability counterclaims as moot because, according to Medrad, the United States Supreme Court has held that a finding of non-infringement does not moot an invalidity counterclaim. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]