Search for: "Affordable Express Corp." Results 341 - 360 of 632
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2014, 8:49 am by Michael Markarian
Congress returns to Washington today to convene the second session of the 113th Congress, and it’s a good time to take stock of what was achieved in 2013 and the pathway for animals in the New Year. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 10:45 pm by Ben Vernia
Prominent among these successes was the department’s $664 million judgment against Connecticut-based defense contractor United Technologies Corp. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:33 pm by Katherine Gasztonyi
In the wake of the recent Target Corp. credit card data breach, Congress is once again turning its attention to data breach legislation. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
The Scope of the Protection Afforded by the Copyright Act It is a basic principle of copyright law that the Act protects only original expression in a work and not mere ideas, stock devices, or elements in the public domain. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  Isn’t that what the Affordable Care Act “employer mandate” is all about? [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
This one is on behalf of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, in Fortres Grand Corp. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:20 am by Schachtman
Express Corp., 665 F.3d 882, 888–89 (2011) (Posner, J.) [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm by Mary Dwyer
Cobb 13-138Issue: (1) Whether after Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
The appeals court examined the possible statutory sources of congressional authorization for EO 11246, and, citing a footnote in Chrysler Corp, found that neither Titles VI nor VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 contain any express delegation of substantive lawmaking authority to the President. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 2:36 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The third case (Autocam Corp. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 (1937) (federal regulatory power extended to intra state activities that could cumulatively have a substantial effect on commerce);  Heart of Atlanta Motel v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Chenery Corp., by upholding agency action based on, and by purporting to “defer” to, an interpretation of the Clean Air Act that the EPA itself not only never adopted – but in fact expressly rejected. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
., 712 F.3d 51 (1st Cir. 2013), and Harden Manufacturing Corp. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:51 pm by Jason Rantanen
If so, which aspects should be afforded deference? [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:30 am by Sheppard Mullin
The majority’s holding that creative use of realistic images and personas does not satisfy the transformative use test cannot be reconciled with the many cases affording such works First Amendment protection. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
The lawyers argued that their concerted action was expression protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:57 am by Eric Alexander
Stryker Corp., No. 12 Civ. 7083 (CM), 2013 U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:45 am by Schachtman
Pharmaceutical manufacturers are particularly vulnerable to securities fraud claims arising from the manufacturers’ pronouncements about safety or efficacy, the evidence for which is often statistical in nature. [read post]