Search for: "Amendments To The Florida Family Law Rules Of Procedure" Results 341 - 360 of 405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Manchin’s family business stood to benefit financially when it was reclassified as something akin to solar, wind, and hydropower. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 11:35 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Readers who have never experienced the peculiar joys of that recurring column's odd collection of factoids should click away (but please remember to click back) to see what they have been missing.In any event, I concede that I included the second half of that sentence gratuitously here because, even though it is irrelevant to the rest of this column, it supports the suspicion that I articulated in one of my Dorf on Law columns last week, where I discussed the law in… [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Elon Musk has reset industry standards, rolling back strict rules against misinformation on X. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
  The petition said the ruling left the bicameralism requirement advisory and enforceable, while the government maintained any other rule would render every federal law vulnerable to challenge over the smallest of typos. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Lora Reinbold clashed with staffers over mask rules. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:11 pm by Paul Levy
  I discuss below the fact that, in many jurisdictions, the old rule that “equity will not enjoin a libel” remains good law to this day. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 7:25 am by Juan C. Antúnez
The procedural path of this case supports the notion that Tendler’s claim should not have been dismissed. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
It still asks whether the Florida Supreme Court violated clearly established law by allowing a trial court that had found reasonable doubt regarding the defendant’s competency to then allow the defendant to represent himself at his own competency hearing. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
The Court now told the lawyers to address much broader issues about the relationship of corporations to the First Amendment. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”Finally, Olson said, “I would not rule that out, Justice Stevens. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
FBI Arrests Puerto Rico Lawmaker, Family in Corruption Probe Associated Press News – Danica Coto | Published: 8/17/2020 FBI agents arrested Puerto Rico Rep. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Arizona – ‘Catastrophic,’ ‘a Shock’: Arizona’s Abortion Ruling Threatens to Upend 2024 Races MSN – Maegan Vazquez and Mariana Alfaro (Washington Post) | Published: 4/10/2024 The Arizona Supreme Court revived a near-total ban on abortion, invoking an 1864 law that forbids the procedure except to save a mother’s life and punishes providers with prison time. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 5:35 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
§ 164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D); To revise its policies and procedures regarding access establishment and modification and termination pursuant to 45 C.F.R. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
If the ruling stands, it could deal a blow to the effort to crack down on undisclosed foreign influence campaigns in the U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Though the rules of criminal procedure govern the discovery process in current law, the commission operates [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
’ (Patently-O) Recent USPTO roundtable – proposed BPAI Ex Parte Appeals Rules modifications (Daily Dose of IP) (Inventive Step) USPTO announces interim procedure for patentees to request patent term adjustment recalculation (Anticipate This!) [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
This mirrors changes the Republican-controlled Legislature already imposed on those proposing new laws through initiatives. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
In 2016, lawmakers amended the state’s campaign finance laws amid a bitter debate over “dark money. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
   After initial but partly unsuccessful efforts by the Justice Department to head off most of the challenges for procedural reasons, District Court judges started reaching conflicting decisions about the validity of the ACA and particularly the constitutionality of the mandate. [read post]