Search for: "Analog Devices, Inc"
Results 341 - 360
of 522
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
Regal Ware, Inc et al (Docket Report) ITC decides not to review initial determination on invalidity in certain printing and imaging devices involving Ricoh and Oki Data (ITC Law Blog) ITC decides not to review enforcement initial determination in certain voltage regulators (337-TA-564) involving Linear Technology and Advanced Analogic Technologies (ITC Law Blog) Defending yourself in inequitable conduct proceedings – CAFC en banc hearing pending: Therasense,… [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 9:13 am
" Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 7:06 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 128 S. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996), and with PMA devices currently. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am
That means it's equally applicable to the misuse of other federal statutes to bring FDCA-based claims as it is to analogous state-law attempts. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 12:08 pm
Lycos, Inc. (1st Cir. 2007). [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
A closer analogy may be correspondence via telephone text messaging—an exchange of short messages across a communications network between persons using devices associated with unique numbers. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:37 am
Mars Petcare US, Inc., No. 18-15026, --- F.3d ----, 2020 WL 4331765 (9th Cir. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 12:00 am
Intern., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 3:16 pm
See Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 3:57 am
A work may be performed ”either directly or by means of any device or process,” and these devices or processes would encompass sound or visual reproduction equipment of all kinds, amplifying systems, radio and television transmitting and receiving apparatus, electronic retrieval devices, and a host of other techniques, undoubtedly including some not invented yet. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:53 am
Rebecca Tushnet, Harvard Law School, On PufferyPuffery is a concept that purports to be about things consumers ignore and don’t rely on. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 6:42 pm
The case is Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:32 am
An analogous issue arose in Tapley v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 4:08 pm
An analogous issue arose in Tapley v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 5:58 am
(Oracle America, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:58 pm
Analog Devices, Inc., 172 F.3d 817, 824 (Fed. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 7:31 pm
Nathan Kimmel, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
AT&T Servs., Inc., 950 F.3d 458 (7th Cir. 2020): (1) the phrase might modify both store and produce, meaning a device must be able to do at least one of those actions using a random or sequential number generator to be an ATDS; (2) the phrase may describe the telephone numbers themselves, limiting an ATDS to a device that dials randomly or sequentially generated numbers; (3) the phrase may attach only to the word produce, bringing devices with the mere ability… [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:20 pm
As a general matter, the unconditional sale of a patented device exhausts the patentee's right to control the purchaser's use of the device thereafter, on the theory that the patentee has bargained for, and received, the full value of the goods. [read post]
