Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability v."
Results 341 - 360
of 552
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2015, 11:30 am
Nothing resembling this mass consolidation has been seen on the federal level in some twenty years since appellate courts stepped in and called a halt to jumbo asbestos consolidations in Cimino v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:56 am
This stock wasn't doing too well because of the asbestos-related product-liability litigation. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 5:09 pm
Tisi serves as co-chair of the Plaintiffs’ Discovery for In Re: Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, MD 2738 (D.N.J.). [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:11 pm
In re Rezulin Products Liability Litig., 309 F.Supp. 2d 531, 541 (S.D.N.Y. 2004). [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 5:51 pm
The commentary to 388 provides liability where the product seller was in possession of the dangerous chattel, which was not the case here, as the product was not shipped with the insulation, and the insulation was purchased separately. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm
One of the legal "rules" here is the product-line successor liability rule. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:01 am
In cases such as Rohl, where the primary issue is one of product liability, Illinois courts have found that the location of the accident is less significant and largely supplanted by a more general interest in resolving a claim concerning an allegedly defective product.[5] Also, because a jury visit to the accident site is generally unnecessary, the significance of this factor is further diminished in product liability claims.[6] On appeal, forum… [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:45 am
In re: Bisphenol-A Polycarbonate Plastic Products Liability Litigation, No. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:45 pm
The second case, In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, MDL 875, 2012 U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:30 pm
Moore v. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 8:50 am
The case was Edward and Carmelita O’Donnell v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
What we quarrel with is admitting asbestos-style rank hearsay for product identification purposes.In a busy week, one can expect pain pump litigation to contribute its share, and it did. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:42 am
Blake writes about federal jurisdiction in an asbestos products' liability case where the exposure allegedly occurred on the Aberdeen Proving Ground. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:42 am
Blake writes about federal jurisdiction in an asbestos products' liability case where the exposure allegedly occurred on the Aberdeen Proving Ground. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
Section 402A certainly opened the way for applying products liability law to protect the employees of purchasers. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:11 pm
ACE Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:05 am
The Betz v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 11:13 am
App. 2007) (“Kaiser Cement”) (in inter-insurer dispute, asbestos liabilities that arose out at many different locations from different products and situations creating exposure, were not all a single occurrence); Lennar Corp. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 9:57 am
Asbestos Hot-Zones California continues to be a hotbed for asbestos lawsuits. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:43 am
Folta’s asbestos exposure occurred at his Ferro workplace, from 1966 to 1970, during which time raw asbestos and many finished asbestos product suppliers provided warnings about the dangers of asbestos inhalation. [read post]
