Search for: "B Henderson"
Results 341 - 360
of 625
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2012, 1:49 am
Lancashire County Council case, by Alasdair Henderson on the UK Human Rights Blog. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:53 pm
See also, e.g., In re Henderson, 395 B.R. 893, 901-02 (Bankr. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 2:45 pm
Masahiro Fujita (Kansai University): Informational Justice in Jury Research: Reframing Prior Jury Researches Jeremy Gans (University of Melbourne): Verbal Equivalents to Likelihood Ratios: Limited Probative Value, Strong Prejudicial Effect, Inconclusive Admissibility, Immoderate Usage Claire M Germain (University of Florida): Recent Developments in the French Criminal Jury Toby S Goldbach (Cornell University): Lay Participation in the Criminal Trial: First Nations Sentencing Circles and Law Reform… [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
CONFOUNDING Back in 2000, several law professors wrote an essay, in which they detailed some of the problems faced in expert witness gatekeeping. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:39 pm
Wright is a Las Vegas family law attorney with The Wright Law Offices, PC located in Las Vegas, Nevada, near Green Valley Henderson. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:29 am
I won't set out the facts and reasoning as it's (a) tortuous and (b) appears to be on its own facts. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:29 am
I won't set out the facts and reasoning as it's (a) tortuous and (b) appears to be on its own facts. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 10:11 am
The panel comprised judges Karen LeCraft Henderson and David Tatel, and Senior Judge Stephen Williams. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
They agreed with each other although Kay LJ gave the lead judgment on the former, answered in the positive; and Henderson J gave the lad judgment on the latter, answered in the negative.On the former, the appellants’ case was that the rules had a disparate adverse impact on the disabled or fail to take account of the differences between the disabled and the able-bodied. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
They agreed with each other although Kay LJ gave the lead judgment on the former, answered in the positive; and Henderson J gave the lad judgment on the latter, answered in the negative.On the former, the appellants’ case was that the rules had a disparate adverse impact on the disabled or fail to take account of the differences between the disabled and the able-bodied. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:17 am
If A, being a liveryman, keeps his horse standing idle in the stable, and B, against his wish or without his knowledge, rides or drives it out, it is no answer to A for B to say: ‘Against what loss do you want to be restored? [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
A high-profile week at the Leveson Inquiry, with evidence from Rebekah Brooks, the MailOnline editor Martin Clarke and Andy Coulson (see Natalie Peck’s Inforrm roundup). [read post]
13 May 2012, 3:17 am
At The Legal Whiteboard, Bill Henderson is trying to tell us what it's saying. [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:40 pm
Jim has lined up several noted speakers and a summary of the program follows:THE GREENSBORO BAR ASSOCIATIONPRESENTSLAW DAY 2012 “THE RULE OF LAW”FRIDAY, MAY 4, 2012 NoonGUILFORD COUNTY GOVERNMENTAL PLAZA,(if bad weather, Commissioners’ Meeting Room, Old Courthouse).PROGRAMPRESENTATION OF COLORS by HONOR GUARD of Guilford County Sheriff Department.SINGING OF “NATIONAL ANTHEM” led by Ken Free, Knight & Free, Greensboro… [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:07 pm
B. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.Appeals -- Law of the case -- Petition for review of order sealing judicial record, filed by intervenor, who sought tape recordings and transcripts of recordings which state and defendant claimed were recordings of defense attorney and a forensic psychologist working with defense counsel that were made without consent of either -- Petition for review denied -- Intervenor must accept record and pleadings as they exist and may not raise new issues -- Per curiam decision… [read post]
1 May 2012, 11:13 am
Karl B. [read post]
1 May 2012, 11:13 am
Karl B. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:10 pm
§ 343(i)(2); 21 CFR § 101.4(b)(14). [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:20 pm
The case is now before a three-judge panel consisting of Judges David Sentelle, Karen LeCraft Henderson, and Merrick Garland. [read post]
