Search for: "Banning Company v. California" Results 341 - 360 of 1,158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
In Count VI (Second Count), Plaintiffs claim that the California regulation, 14 C.C.R. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Specific taxation does not require valuation and as such does not require expensive tax administration, as is the case for ad valorem where vertically integrated companies must compute a value to determine tax liability. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
Woodbridge had recently joined hundreds of other school districts across the country in subscribing to GoGuardian, one of a growing number of school-focused surveillance companies. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:14 pm by Cannabis Law Group
That’s why we’ll be closely following the developments in the case of County of Santa Cruz et al v. [read post]
21 Dec 2019, 9:15 am by Cindy Cohn
Here in California, we defended the groundbreaking California Consumer Privacy Act against numerous attempts by powerful Internet companies to weaken its protections for Internet users. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 8:42 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Anyone working on that issue in the California DOJ should take a long, hard look at this opinion. __ Case citation: The Washington Post v. [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 7:45 am by Cannabis Law Group
That’s because in 80 percent of cities in this state, marijuana dispensaries are banned. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
Facebook, Inc., is a social media company headquartered in Menlo Park, California. [read post]