Search for: "Bishop v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 852
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am
He will be consecrated bishop on May 11 and will adopt the title of Bishop of Bardsey, as well as Assistant Bishop of Bangor. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 11:51 am
(Note: in the Journal, the results of the voting are stated by orders. [read post]
14 May 2008, 5:40 am
In State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:00 am
” The case involving the Massachusetts statute is McCullen v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 6:00 pm
This post will review the court’s opinion in State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 1:16 pm
Texas, which declared the state's anti-sodomy law unconstitutional. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 5:14 am
Rose Schurer, Andrea DeVivo v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:22 pm
BISHOP: Yes. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 12:50 pm
Bishop, 412 U.S. 346, 358-59 (1973); Sansone v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:25 am
Plaintiff’s equivocal denial of knowledge of the terms of the settlement is flatly contradicted by the clear terms of the settlement agreement (see Bishop v Maurer, 33 AD3d 497, 499 [1st Dept 2006], affd 9 NY3d 910 [2007]). [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 2:50 am
State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:33 am
But if a new diocese is formed out of an unorganized area, Article V itself spells out the procedure that is followed: "The proceedings shall originate in a Convocation of the Clergy and Laity of the unorganized area called by the Bishop for that purpose . . . [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:24 am
In Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
The spotlight stays on the high-profile union-fees case that will be argued this month, Janus v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 6:29 am
See Bishop v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
Samar, Toward a New Separation of Church and State: Implications for Analogies to the Supreme Court Decision in Hobby Lobby by the Decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:25 am
Beshear and Roberts v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:57 pm
That, in the judgment of this Council, it is perfectly consistent with the good faith which she owes to the Bishops and Dioceses with which she has been in union since 1862, for any Diocese to decide for herself whether she shall any longer continue in union with this Council;. . .V. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 7:03 pm
utm_term=.e26cdbdc081bOf interest to patent people, Taney was in the dissenting four in Winans v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 10:40 am
The case is Bishop v. [read post]
