Search for: "Blow v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 3,008
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2008, 1:39 pm
On November 29, 2007, Mary Bach struck a blow for all Pennsylvania consumers when a judge agreed with her that, in that state, toilet paper is not taxable. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:55 pm
In the State of Utah v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:04 am
Garcia v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 12:45 pm
Most states, however, including California, impose criminal liability on a person aiding and abetting suicide. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:28 am
Wednesday the Court handed down perhaps its biggest blow to average Americans ever, when it reversed the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Concepcion v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:20 am
Initiative v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
” Under Part V, “Protection from suffering detriment in employment,” of this law, 47B on “Protected disclosures” states that, “A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
” Under Part V, “Protection from suffering detriment in employment,” of this law, 47B on “Protected disclosures” states that, “A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 5:30 pm
In Patriotic Veterans v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 1:00 am
The case, Moore v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 1:00 am
The case, Moore v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:08 am
Gelfand v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 6:44 pm
Hendow v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 10:14 am
Sixth Circuit reinstates Ohio State University’s Lanham Act and state law right-of-publicity claims against Redbubble: You can access today’s ruling of the U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 10:01 am
The case, Arizona v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 3:43 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
The Doctrine of Collateral Estoppel does not bar litigating claims involving the same parties that were not previously considered in prior administrative or judicial actionsMehulic v New York Downtown Hosp., 2017 NY Slip Op 06416, Appellate Division, First DepartmentFollowing a number of adverse administrative rulings, Surana Mehulic brought an Article 78 action against her former employer, New York Downtown Hospital [Hospital] alleging it had impermissibly retaliated against her… [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:30 am
CareFlite Accessing an Employee’s Facebook Posts by “Shoulder Surfing” a Coworker’s Page States Privacy Claim — Ehling v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:07 am
United States Dept. of Labor, 679 F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir.1982), where the Court had held that judicial approval is necessary of settlements in FLSA lawsuits. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 3:49 pm
Consider, for instance, New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
