Search for: "Brand v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 6,510
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2011, 12:24 pm
In Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 6:31 am
The ongoing Utah case on patent infringement is Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:55 am
An example might be a branded product that is also supplied as a supermarket product as was the case with Weetabix and Asda’s Wheat Bisks, mentioned in the Penguin v Puffin case (1997).In contrast, a product packaged to look like a familiar brand but without the same qualities and/or not made by the same company lies and sends wrong, highly misleading signals to shoppers. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
All of this hubbub surrounds the Supreme Court decision in the PLIVA v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
In National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:13 am
In UCB v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:07 am
Minsky v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 3:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm
The Court denied cert. without comment in two cases that it relisted last week, S&M Brands Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
A company called dkcb Pty Ltd opted to bring a auDRP complaint in 2017 (dkcb Pty Ltd v Eveready Pty Ltd). [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
A company called dkcb Pty Ltd opted to bring a auDRP complaint in 2017 (dkcb Pty Ltd v Eveready Pty Ltd). [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 1:42 pm
However, in Bausch v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 12:17 pm
Jaeger (Voting Rights) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlMendoza v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:34 am
One of the more recent and aggressive shifts in state tax administration has been the rise of the state False Claims Act, or FCA, tax lawsuit. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 2:59 am
I reported on the Baxendale v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 9:36 am
In Jane Doe No. 14 v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 3:27 am
Realty, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
Costco Wholesale Corp, 541 F.3d 982 (9th Cir. 2008).That case involved the importation into the United States of Omega-brand watches. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 2:49 am
The First Circuit's decision in Chaloult v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 5:30 am
Buzz because they deviated from the norm, which may appeal to potential consumers who have yet to decide what side they’re on (PC v. [read post]
